Advanced Clinical Therapy- A
New Approach
Copyright © February 2004 Ted Nissen
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction. 1
2 Theoretical Perspectives. 7
3 Literature Review.. 21
4 Research Questions and Hypothetical Discussion. 26
5 Single Case (Anecdotal) Studies. 30
6 Clinical Assessment and Treatment 82
1.1 Forward
1.1.1
We all seem to have a book in
us but the sad fact of hard copy printing, is that most books don’t find a
publisher and most that are published barely pay for the costs of publishing
let alone the for the writers time. Publishing is undergoing a not so quite
revolution with the prevalence of fast (DSL) online Internet access because for
better or worse anyone with an Internet connection and Web Hosting can put
their ideas to electronic print. The following is a work in progress. That
means as I write it I will post it on the Web for your review. There may be
misspellings, missing sections, theoretical missteps, awkward phrases, grammatical
lapses and inevitable misinformation, which occur without a good editor. With
your patience, It is hoped you will find this information useful and
insightful. It represents more than 30 years of massage practice, a very
curious mind, and a sincere desire to help other massage practitioners. If you
would like to help me with this project use this link. Web Site Help For more information on the volunteer
positions needed in creating this site. Information
Ted Nissen Long Beach California February 2004
1.2 Preface
1.2.1 This is an online textbook for the Massage and related professions
meant to describe a theoretical perspective and novel assessment protocols,
which will assist the soft tissue therapist, apply currently known techniques
to areas of irritation, which are the root cause of common soft tissue disease.
Soft tissue disease causes significant health problems and much pain and
suffering to many patients. Soft Tissue Therapy when applied to these small
areas is expected to increase the curative effect of soft tissue treatments.
Although other soft tissue therapists (Chiropractors, Physical Therapists ect)
may find the conceptual constructs and assessment protocols useful massage
therapists would benefit most because they simply have more time to spend with
patients. The assessment techniques are time consuming and lend themselves
better to the Massage Therapy Profession.
1.2.2 The massage therapist has a face to many Americans and is no longer
a shady character in some sleazy massage parlour. With the depiction of the
massage therapist in many popular TV shows (Friends ect) and with the advent of
chair massage in offices and businesses many people now feel comfortable going
to a massage therapist for their aches and stress. Given this popular support,
insurance companies are beginning to pay claims with the massage therapist as
sole provider (Blue Shield). State licensing of the massage therapist should
improve the quality of patient care and replace archaic punitive municipal laws
in the regulation of the massage therapy profession. This professional
evolution can be seen in other professions such as Chiropractic and Nursing by
example.
1.2.3 Massage is still thought of as a palliative treatment for stress and
for temporary relief of minor aches and pains. The Spa industry is probably the
major employer of massage therapists although Chiropractic, Physical Therapy
Centers and Hospitals employ in lesser but significant numbers. Vocational
schools do a very good job at Training students in basic technical knowledge
and massage techniques used in the Spas and clinics. Traditional Vocational
Education evolved as way of training students who did not plan for University
training for a professional career. Vocational schools are businesses, which
provide the business community with semi skilled workers to meet the demands of
their customers.
1.2.4 In addition to this trend are more experienced massage therapists
who are applying massage techniques to Orthopaedic and other medical problems.
Sports massage evolved as an effective treatment for sports injuries and as a
way to improve athletic performance. Orthopaedic Massage is taught in some Massage
Schools and has a small but growing support.
1.2.5 Another trend is an interest in developing a body of research data
on the effects of massage therapy on a variety of common ailments.
1.2.6 This textbook will provide a useful theoretical perspective and
novel assessment protocols to Vocational school teachers/students, Experienced
massage therapists, and massage researchers.
1.3 Why Do Research?
1.3.1 Massage although increasingly popular with the general public is still
viewed with considerable controversy by the medical community. Negative
associations with “laying on of hands” conjure up notions of charlatanism and
since many prostitutes still use massage parlours as a front for their business
questionable morality is added to the mix. The trend toward state licensing of
massage therapists along with Massage Therapy Associations strong support for
ethical standards may serve to counterweight these negative associations.
1.3.2 Even with these considerations aside the value of massage therapy,
if any, is frequently felt to be of a psychological nature or the result of the
placebo phenomenon. Worse, those who have advocated the use of massage for
non-scientific or non-physiological mechanisms that the medically oriented professional
cannot always accept. Reflex zones,
trigger points, fibrositic nodules, and meridians have all been identified as
areas to which massage may be directed, but have never been identified as true
anatomical or physiological entities.
Massage may also be recommended for conditions, which by themselves do
not warrant its use such as pain, for conditions that are not proven to respond
to massage therapy such as obesity, or for clinical entities that do not exist,
such as cellulite removal.
1.3.3 In addition, there is little empiric or direct scientific evidence
for the efficacy of massage. Massage
tends to be used on the basis that it "seems to work;" it makes the
patients feel better. So, while there
is little question among clinicians who employ massage as therapeutic measure
that it has some value, its value is not well documented. This is primarily because massage is often
used for the relief of painful conditions in which there a few associated
pathological signs. This makes reliable
measurement of the possible effects of treatment a difficult problem in
research design methodology and technology.
While massage may certainly provide temporary pain relief in many
conditions, it does not necessarily contribute to the long-term relief of pain,
which requires resolution of the pathological state.
1.3.4 The result of the prevailing attitudes towards massage is that it is
often not used in the treatment of some conditions for which it might have a
significant therapeutic effect.
1.3.5 Massage may be more readily justified and rationalized in the
following instances, where it may have a direct or indirect of effect upon the
pathological state.
1.3.5.1
Deep stroking in the presence of
certain edematous conditions may assist in the resolution of fluid
accumulations.
1.3.5.2
A variety of massage techniques can be
used to reflexively promote muscle relaxation for more effective mobilization
of a part. This may certainly be useful
when abnormal muscle tension is an important factor in the perpetuation of the
pathological process
1.3.5.3
Deep frictions and kneading types of
massage may assist in restoring mobility between tissue interfaces or may
increase extensibility of individual structures.
1.3.5.4
Massage also tends to increase
circulation to the area treated, which may be desirable in certain cases.
1.3.5.5
These effects are generally well
described in traditional massage textbooks along with descriptions of related
massage techniques. [1] [2] [3] [4]
1.3.6 Research is needed for pathologies per above that might reasonably
respond to massage treatments to determine if any curative benefit is achieved.
1.4 What is Science?
1.4.1 Systematic prolonged study, observation, Theoretical Modelling,
Experimentation, predictive/descriptive conclusions corroborative verification
and willingness to abandon cherished theory when the evidence doesn’t support
it. Pythagoras (6th Century BC), Galileo (1564-1642 ad), and Ben
Franklin are examples.
1.4.2 The Pythagorean discovery that the pitch of a note depends on the
length of the string which produces it, and that concordant intervals in the
scale are produced by simple numerical ratios (2 : 1 octave, 3 : 2 fifth, 4 : 3
fourth, etc.), was epoch-making: it was the first successful reduction quality
to quantity, the first step towards the mathematization of human experience –
and therefore the beginning of Science. The Pythagorean theorem showed us how
mathematics can reveal relationships in shapes that confound our eyes. There is no obvious relationship between the
lengths of the sides of a right-angled triangle; when we build a square over
each side, the areas of the two smaller squares will exactly equal the area of
the larger. In such wonderfully ordered
laws, hitherto hidden from the human eye, could be discovered by the
contemplation of number shapes, was it not legitimate to hope that soon all
secrets of the universe would be revealed through them?
1.4.3 Galileo constructed a working model of the solar system with
elliptical planetary orbits and a light source at the center and from the
vantage point of the earth drew the phases of Venus on a piece of paper as it
revolved around the light source. With
a telescope he then observed Venus as it revolved around the sun and likewise
drew it. The drawings of the phases of Venus were the same from the model and
the actual observations demonstrating by analogy the elliptical orbits of
plants around the sun.
1.4.4 For centuries, the devastating scourge of lightning had generally
been considered supernatural phenomena.
During a 35-year period in Germany alone during the mid 1700's, 386
churches were struck and more than a100 bell ringers killed and in Venice some
3000 people were killed when tons of gunpowder stored in a church was hit. Ben
Franklin in journal he kept for its experiments noted the similarities between
the sparks produced by an electrostatic device and the look, shape, and even
smell of lightening. in June 1752 49 year old Ben Franklin and is 21 year old
son William chased lightning strikes in the Philadelphia farm fields. Franklin had fashioned the silk kite with a
sharp metal wire attached. At the end of the string which held the kite high in
the air he attached a metal key which drew the charge from a lightening strike
down the wet string through the key into a Leyden Jar (primitive battery).
Later he was able to use the electrical charge in the battery to cook a Turkey.
These discoveries prompted the installation of lightening rods which drew the
destructive electrical charge of the lightening harmlessly into the earth.
1.5 Profession Vs. Vocation
1.5.1 Professionals solve societal problems whose resolution is highly
valued and whose professional practice requires academic institutional support
and scientific (prolonged systematic) study. These are problems that can not
readily be resolved by the uninitiated with trial and error problem solving
1.5.2 A vocation
2
Theoretical Perspectives
2.1 Introduction
2.1.1 There are a plethora of massage techniques but few theoretical
models, which inform the massage profession. Technique tells us how we might
fix it but not why it is broken. Theory suggests a broad range of techniques
many of which would be undiscovered without theory (Structural Integration
spawned Heller Work Ect.). Theory asks the simple question “why is something
so?” It is the analysis of a set of
speculative facts in their relation to one another with the hope of answering
the WHY questions. Our clients come to us because they experience some measure
of discomfort (emotional and or physical) from the mild to excruciating. The
question which we can then ask is “Why do we hurt?”. In addition to being
descriptive, a theory should predict objective observable phenomena, which
others can witness. These are anecdotal accounts of others in the profession or
patients who have witnessed or can report the outcomes. It is called anecdotal
because it is unscientific in that your data is based on observations of
unscientific observers. This is where theory comes to life. This anecdotal
evidence pro and con is the meat and substance of theory. The purpose of this
section is to outline a theoretical model (Theoretical
Model Why Do We Hurt?) with scientific
references Literature Review, predictive outcomes and suggest a disease process, assessment,
technique and treatment. Thus begins the discourse for lively scientific debate.
If the Massage Therapy Profession is to join the scientific community of soft
tissue professionals, we are benefited in our discussions when we can reference
a theoretical model, which shares a common language with other professions.
2.2 Visualization of Theoretical Perspective
Theoretical
Model-Why Do We Hurt?
2.3 Core Theory (Descriptive and Predictive)
2.3.1 Summary
2.3.1.1
A significant degree of patient
discomfort and dysfunction after novel, repetitive or over activity can be caused
by small areas of irritation and ischemia (Inflammatory, metabolic and or
neurological Etiology) near where the ligaments and tendons attach to the bone
or at biomechanical stress points along their course. It is expected that this
root cause will be much more prevalent than the usual explanations or Diagnosis
by soft tissue professionals (Medical Doctors, Physical Therapists,
Chiropractors, Sports Doctors and others) for the pain phenomena post exercise
or activity soreness (Sprain/Strain, DOM, Trigger Points, Subluxation ect).
These areas of irritation are created in response to novel, repetitive or over
activity. Symptoms and tissue sensitivity seem to increase with age and with
the presence of other pathologies such as Osteoarthritis, Degenerative Disc
Disease, Diabetes, and stress. These areas of irritation refer distally in
predictable and observable patterns causing a wide array of symptoms from
headaches to muscle weakness, trigger points and postural dysfunction.
2.3.1.2
Simple palpation techniques (dermatomal, sclerotomal, myotomal,
and extrasegmental), range of motion assessment, postural assessment and muscle
testing are but a few of the assessment techniques which can point to areas
which would benefit from soft tissue treatment.
2.3.1.3
Massage Therapy can increase the
circulation of blood and lymph fluid to and from these relatively discrete
areas thereby relieving not only the symptoms but also the cause of the
problem. Examples of typical areas of irritation are; Glenohumeral Tendon
attachments, Muscle tendon attachments to the medial superior scapular angle,
Cervical Facet Ligaments, Cervical Spinal Ligaments, Lower lumbar spinal and
facet ligaments, Deep Hip Rotators tendon attachments, and sacroiliac tendon
and ligament attachments. Simple palpation techniques, range of motion
assessment, postural assessment and muscle testing are well suited to the
massage environment and can define the areas of therapeutic treatment. Massage
treatments such as ischemic compression, stripping massage and therapeutic stretching
are effective treatments with curative effects to primary and secondary
treatment areas.
2.3.2 Detailed Discussion
2.3.2.1
Root Cause of Post Activity
Nociceptive Phenomena
2.3.2.1.1
A significant amount of muscle tension, pain and dysfunction
that the average person experiences after novel, repetitive or over activity is
caused by irritation of the afferent sensory nerve fibers which supply the
tendon and ligament cells near where they attach to the bone or at
biomechanical stress points along their course.
Gutstein-Good[9] [10] It is expected that this root cause will be
much more prevalent than the usual explanations or Diagnosis by soft tissue
professionals (Medical Doctors, Physical Therapists, Chiropractors, Sports
Doctors and others) for the pain phenomena post exercise or activity soreness
(Sprain/Strain, DOM, Trigger Points, Subluxation ect).
2.3.2.2
Hume’s Fork- Tendon and Ligament
Metabolic Stress
2.3.2.2.1
The tendon and ligament cells near where they attach to the
bone receive greater stress than the other cells of the tendon or ligament
because of their proximity to the bone, which is being pulled by opposing
muscles. In the tradition of analytic
empiricism promulgated by the 18th century Scottish philosopher,
David Hume (Hume’s Fork) the following simple experiment will reveal these
stresses. If you cut a strip of paper ¼ to 1/3 of an inch thick and affix one
end to a stable surface while pulling on the other end the following result
should occur. Assuming the paper strip is equally strong in all its parts, the
strip of paper will break more frequently on either end of the paper strip.
That is near where your pinched fingers are pulling (the paper breaks more
commonly at this site) or where you have affixed the other end. In the case of
ligament cells, both ends of their attachments are vulnerable to the stresses
of movement and receive greater metabolic demand. In the case of tendon cells
only the cells near the bone seem prone to irritation probably because the
tendon cells which interdigitate with the muscle cells have a better blood
supply than the cells near the bone. Biomechanical stress points are usually
areas of a tendon which receive greater stress because they are being pressed
on by other structures such as bone and or soft tissue (this may occlude blood
supply) or flexed repetitively (this may transfer mechanical stress to the apex
of the flexing action). An example is at the Talocrural joint where the
posterior tendons of plantar flexor muscles are repeatedly flexed and in the
case of the tarsal canal muscles (flexor hallucis longus, tibialis posterior,
flexor digitorum longus) pressed against the dome of the calcaneus. In the case
of the Achilles tendon this biomechanical stress point is 3 to 5 cm proximal to
the insertion onto the calcaneus as this is the most common site of Achilles
tendonitis. Repetitive activities such as such as running and or walking
repeatedly flex and straighten the tendon so that the cells in tendon and
ligament cells (fibroblasts) in this area of the tendon receive greater stress
in a similar manner to the cells near where the tendon and ligament attach to
the bone. To demonstrate this principal with the above-defined strip of paper
if you repeatedly flex and straighten the strip and then affix one end to a
stable surface while pulling on the other end the following result should
occur. The paper strip will break at the apex of the flexing action. This apex
of the paper strip is the biomechanical stress point
2.3.2.3
Fixed Vascular Supply
2.3.2.3.1
The blood and lymph supply to these tendon and ligament cells
is probably fixed based on the usual activity of the person. When a patient
becomes more active (Over activity), initiates a new movement (Novel Activity),
or repeats a movement more times than usual (Repetitive Activity) the tendon and
ligament cells need more oxygen, glucose, and protein to survive.
2.3.2.4
Increased Metabolic Demand can result
in Cell stress and or Death
2.3.2.4.1
Since the body cannot meet the cells metabolic demand they
either die or the demand on the cells must be reduced. That is the person must
become less active. How would anyone know to become less active unless they
received a distress call from the overworked tendon and ligament cells? Cells
can get stressed out to you know.
2.3.2.5
Distress Call from
Overworked Tendon and Ligament Cells (Reflex ARC) (Sympathetic Afferent Over
stimulation)
2.3.2.5.1
The body has an ingenious way of doing this by decreasing the
blood flow to the cells. The Sympathetic Nerves become over stimulated. Perhaps
as yet unknown chemical messengers from the overworked tendon and ligament
cells cause this over stimulation (Afferent Fibers from blood vessels supplying
muscle and tendon cells near bone attachments) The efferent fibers of the
sympathetic nervous system constrict the muscles around the arterial walls (vasoconstriction)
and the blood flow to the cells is reduced (ischemia). Revis
[11] This is what is known as a Reflex Arc. Incoming
sensory stimulation (Afferent Fibers) from the viscera triggers a response from
the spinal cord, which in turn sends its response to the viscera (Efferent
Fibers). This is very similar to overloading electrical circuits, which trigger
a fuse to shut down the power.
2.3.2.6
Increased Concentration of Metabolites
Irritate Afferent Sensory Nerve Fibres (Ischemia)
2.3.2.6.1
This reduces the flow of the metabolic waste out of the area
and increases the concentration of these wastes resulting in irritation of the
afferent sensory nerve fibers resulting in Nociceptive (Uncomfortable, Noxious)
Example Kellgren[12] The patient is thereby informed to reduce the
activity level.
2.3.2.7
Cell Death
2.3.2.7.1
If the person does not reduce their activity level, the cells
in these areas may die in sufficient numbers and produce a higher concentration
of enzymatic chemicals.
2.3.2.8
Inflammatory Chemicals (Enzymatic
Trigger)
2.3.2.8.1
These enzymes initiate the production of inflammatory
chemicals from the cell walls of the local vessels (blood and Lymph?).
2.3.2.9
Vessels Become Porous
2.3.2.9.1
These inflammatory chemicals (Kinin System, Prostaglandins and
Leukotrienes ect) decrease the size of the cells, which comprise the walls of
these vessels. These or other chemicals may also initiate the relaxation of
muscles surrounding the vessels resulting in vasodilation. Revis
[13]
2.3.2.10
Decreased Concentration of Metabolic
Waste (Edema)
2.3.2.10.1
Fluid from the blood and lymph system
flows out of the vessels in greater volume because the opening in the vessel
walls has increased (vasodilation) and the vessels have become more porous.
This fluid flows to the areas with less interstitial fluid (osmosis) around the
tendon and ligament cells and helps decrease the concentration of metabolic
waste.
2.3.2.11
Temporary Reduction in Nociceptive Sensory
Phenomena
2.3.2.11.1
This may temporally reduce the excitation of the afferent
nerve fibers. This reduced excitation will be short lived.
2.3.2.12
Inflammatory Chemicals Irritate
Afferent Sensory Nerves
2.3.2.12.1
Afferent Sensory Nerve fibers are excited by the increased concentration
of inflammatory chemicals. This nerve irritation may result in Nociceptive
(Uncomfortable, Noxious) Sensory Phenomena Example.
The patient is thereby informed to reduce the activity level.
2.3.2.13
Lymphatic System (Macrophages) carries
away Dead Tendon and Ligament Cells
2.3.2.13.1
Because vessel walls become more
porous, large lymphatic cells (macrophages) are able to travel in and out of
the area of injury to retrieve and carry away dead ligament and tendon cells.
2.3.2.14
Inflammatory chemicals Encourage New
Vessel Growth
2.3.2.14.1
Inflammatory chemicals may have the additional benefit of
encouraging the growth blood vessels, which will increase the blood supply and
allow for greater future activity (Exercise Adaptation).
2.3.2.15
Activity Level Remains the Same
2.3.2.15.1
If the person continues their activity level, the problems
will be exacerbated.
2.3.2.16
Increased Cell Death
2.3.2.16.1
, Cells in these areas will continue to die.
2.3.2.17
Increased Concentration of
Inflammatory Chemicals
2.3.2.17.1
Cell Death will result in higher concentration of enzymatic
chemicals and resultant increase in inflammatory chemicals.
2.3.2.18
Referred Sensory Phenomena
2.3.2.18.1
Afferent Sensory Nerve fibers are excited by the increased
concentration of inflammatory chemicals. This nerve irritation may result in
Nociceptive (Uncomfortable, Noxious) Sensory Phenomena Example
The patient is thereby informed to reduce the activity level.
2.3.2.19
Increased Skin Conductance
2.3.2.19.1
The area of ischemia or inflammation because it excites the
area nerve supply should be detectable by surface instruments that measure skin
conductance. The surface of the skin will become moister over these areas and
thus conduct an electrical impulse more readily. This along with the palpation
assessment methods outlined below can provide researchers with prima facie
evidence of underlying pathology. Travell J
[14]
2.3.2.20
Referral Patterns, Nociceptive
Phenomena, and Clinical Observations
2.3.2.20.1
The irritated nerves refer distally in predictable and
observable patterns (dermatomally, sclerotomally, myotomally, and
extrasegmentally, and or Trigger Point Referral Zones) Kellgren
[15] causing a wide array of Nociceptive
(Uncomfortable, Noxious) Sensory Phenomena eg (Pain, headaches, sweating,
blanching, and nausea, (sometimes referred Cutaneous Paresthesia and numbness
instead of deep pain). Inman VT, Saunders JB
[16] Clinical Phenomena may be observed (Muscle
weakness, trigger points, postural dysfunction) Most objective clinical measures
may not reveal the underlining disease process
2.3.2.21
Differential Assessment
2.3.2.21.1
Cell death is accelerated and sympathetic nervous system
hypersensitivity is exacerbated when the clinical picture is complicated by
other disease processes such as degenerative disc disease, Postural Faults,
Osteoarthritis, stress, fibromyalgia, Lyme disease, diabetes, and other organic
dysfunction to name some by example. Practitioners would need to rule out other
organic disease, which can mimic soft tissue dysfunction symptoms before a
tentative conclusion is reached regarding a course of soft tissue treatment.
Stress can also accelerate cell death by reducing blood circulation to tendon
and ligament cells.
2.3.2.22
Massage Therapy
2.3.2.22.1
Soft Tissue Therapies such as Massage Therapy is effective to
the extent that it increases circulation to these relatively small areas of
metabolic dysfunction with ancillary treatment to the distal referral zones
where secondary and tertiary dysfunction such as muscular weakness and trigger
points can further complicate the clinical picture. Massage may be more
effective when superficial structures can be accessed with ischemic compression
or other massage techniques.
2.3.2.23
Assessment Techniques
2.3.2.23.1
Simple Assessment Techniques can direct therapy to discrete
areas of irritation which increases the effectiveness of massage treatment
Palpation techniques include; nerve referral areas (dermatomal, sclerotomal,
myotomal, and extrasegmental), range of motion assessment, postural assessment
and muscle testing. These assessment techniques can point to but not
necessarily confirm the areas, which would benefit from soft tissue treatment.
2.3.2.24
Laboratory Tests
2.3.2.24.1
Sed rates (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR])may be
elevated when inflammation is pronounced but largely most objective clinical
measures may not reveal the underlining disease process. MRI imaging is will
probably not reveal any underlying pathology.
2.3.2.25
Typical Areas of Irritation
2.3.2.25.1
Glenohumeral Tendon attachments
2.3.2.25.1.1
Refers pain into the temporal area of the skull-Headache Symptoms
2.3.2.25.2
Cervical Facet Ligaments
2.3.2.25.2.1
Refer pain extrasegmentally into the upper back
2.3.2.25.3
Cervical Spinal Ligaments
2.3.2.25.3.1
Refers pain dermatomally depending on the spinal level into
the neck shoulders and arms
2.3.2.25.4
Lower lumbar spinal and facet ligaments
2.3.2.25.4.1
Refer pain extrasegmentally and according to spinal level
dermatomally, can cause postural faults and muscle weakness in hamstrings
2.3.2.25.5.1
Refers into the lower back and down the L5 and S1 Dermatome
into the hamstrings and fascia lata
2.3.2.26
Collagen Fiber Pathology
2.3.2.26.1
Extracellular matrix materials produced by the fibroblast
(Tendon and Ligament Cell) include dense regularly arranged collagenous
(kola=glue) protein fibers that form a zig zag pattern (allows
flexibility=think Chinese finger trap) and are arranged longitudinally along
lines that they are habitually pulled. When healthy these fibers provide
extensibility (they give a little-flexibility) and resistance to force. There
is interfiber mobility between the collagen protein strands and extrafiber
mobility between the bundled collagen fibers and other tissues. When the force applied to these collagen
fibers is not too excessive or novel and nutrition to the fibroblast cell is
adequate, damaged collagen fibers are ingested by the fibroblast cell, which
produces collagen precursors, that, in response to imposed stresses, polymerize
into collagen fibers. These collagen fibers mature with the same zig zag
pattern, intra and extra fiber mobility, extensibility, and resistance to force
as their neighbors and align longitudinally with any novel direction of
pull. This hypertrophic response to
gradually increasing force and novelty to the tendon and ligament tissue does
not produce cell stress, death, pain or inflammation.
2.3.2.26.2
If the force applied to the tendon and ligament fibers is too
great or the direction of pull too dramatic (novelty) and the nutrition to the
fibroblast cell inadequate several pathological conditions may result.
2.3.2.26.2.1
Ligament/Tendon Sprain/Strain
2.3.2.26.2.1.1
This is macrodamage to the tendon and ligament tissue where
massive numbers of collagen fibers are ripped apart. This may involve a partial or complete rupture of the tendon and
ligament tissue such as Achilles tendon rupture or anterior talofibular ligament
sprain. Precipitating factors may include
a history of tendon and or ligament pathology.
2.3.2.26.2.2
Cell Stress
2.3.2.26.2.2.1
As previously mentioned, fibroblast cell stress may result in
vasoconstriction to the area. This
could further compromise the nutritional status of the cell. The fibroblasts ability to produce healthy
collagen fibers may be compromised.
Collagen fibers may not mature properly. The zigzag pattern of the collagen protein may be absent
affecting the fibers extensibility this may result in susceptibility to micro
damage resulting increased concentration of protein particulate matter which
the fibroblast cell may not be able to ingest.
This may begin an inflammatory process with ensuing symptomatic
consequences. Interfiber bonds (adhesions) between the collagen fibers and
extra fiber bonds between the collagen fibers and other tissues may also
develop. Loss of extensibility, reduced resistance to force, increased
susceptibility to micro damage and increased inflammation is the likely result.
2.3.2.26.2.3
Cell Death
2.3.2.26.2.3.1
Fibroblast cell death may mean loss of the capacity of the
tissue to hypertrophy, increased micro damage to the collagen fibers, loss of
extensibility and resistance to force and most certainly an increase of local
inflammation with attendant painful symptoms.
2.3.2.27
Myofascial Trigger Points
2.3.2.27.1
An increased incidence of Myofascial
Trigger Points may result from connective tissue pathology and
dysfunction. An example of this is found when the tendinous attachment of the
infraspinatus develops pathology near its attachment to the posterior aspect of
the humerus. Infraspinatus TP 1-3 become hyperirritable and refer in the
characteristic pain pattern for that muscle.
3.1 Muscles and Tendons
3.1.1 Kellgren [17] injected 0.1-0.3 ml of 6% hypertonic
saline solution into muscle tissue and found that pain was referred distally
from the original injection site.
3.1.2 Kellgren[18] also found that pressure to
sensitive areas of the muscle tissue in patients with "fibrositis"
(Myofacial Trigger Points) reproduced the patients reported pain symptoms.
After Kellgren identified the pain patterns created by these injections he
identified in reverse these problem areas based solely on patient complaints.
The spot tenderness was often remote from the patients reported pain and the
area around that point was not painful to the patient. When that spot was
injected with procaine, the patients reported pain was relieved.
3.1.3 Travell[19], Good[20] and Kelly[21] reported similar findings. In
1967, Hockaday and Whitty[22] confirmed Kellgren's principle
findings.
3.1.4 These tender spots sometimes referred cutaneous paresthesias and
numbness instead of deep pain[23].
3.1.5 Myofascial referred pain did not always follow dermatomal[24], myotomal[25] or sclerotomal[26] patterns of innervation[27][28].
3.1.6 Travell & Simons[29] outline several causative
factors of myofascial trigger points including; Direct: Acute overload, Repetitive stress, Chilling, and Gross
Trauma. Indirect: Organ/Joint Disease, Other trigger points and emotional distress.
3.1.7 Trigger Points are a region of muscle tissue, which
is ischemic and or is metabolically elevated from surrounding tissues. Poor
circulation would mean that there would be poor heat distribution and thus the
greater the temperature of the Trigger Point.
For example when a needle thermocouple is first injected into a TP the
temperature is higher than that of the surrounding tissue but after 15-20
seconds lowers to that of the surrounding tissue[30]
3.1.8 Popelianskii, et al.[31] measured the rate at which
radioactive[32] NaI was eliminated from tissue
in the clinically affected area. They reported a distinct prolongation of the
resorption rate of the isotope, which they interpreted as due to impaired local
circulation.
3.1.9 These trigger points can exist in a latent form for decades, become
periodically active restricting range of motion causing varying degrees of
disability from mild to severe. One session using a variety of treatment
modalities, which restore circulation to the ischemic area in the muscle, can
eliminate the TP permanently[33].
3.2 Fascial and Ligamentous Trigger Points
3.2.1 Kellgren [34] injected the fascial epimysium
of the gluteus medius muscle with 0.1 ml of 6% saline solution which referred
pain several centimeters distally. The tendon of the tibiallis anterior,
similarly injected, referred pain to the medial aspect of the ankle and instep.
3.2.2 Travell[35] reported that ankle and foot
pain subsequent to an acute ankle sprain was caused by four TPs in the joint
capsule.
3.2.3 Physiologic saline[36] [37] was injected into Trigger
Points caused by sprains of the knee, ankle, wrist and metacarpophalangeal
joint of the thumb. The referred pain caused by these trigger points was at
first elicited and then permanently relieved by the saline injection.
3.2.4 Leriche[38] injected 5 or 6 ligamentous TP
sites with a local anesthetic following a sprain or fracture with complete pain
relief.
3.2.5 Gorrell[39] outlined a technique for the
identification and injection of ligamentous ankle TPs after reviewing the
anatomy of the ankle ligaments.
3.2.6 Kraus[40] presented a literature review
of injection treatment of ligamentous TPs indicating the ease of point
location, the immediacy of pain relief and the subsequent 10-day post injection
soreness.
3.2.7 Hacket[41] outlined pain patterns of
iliolumbar, sacroiliac, sacrospinal, and sacrotuberous ligaments.
3.2.8 Dittrich[42] studied the latissimus dorsi
aponeurosis and found Trigger Points in the aponeurosis at the junction of the
lumbodorsal fascia which referred pain to the shoulder region.
3.2.9 Weiser[43] relieved medial knee pain
symptoms by injecting 2% lidocaine (Xylocaine) with triamcinolone into the
tender spot at the insertion of the semimembranosus muscle in 98 patients.
3.2.10
De Valera and Raftery[44] injected a local anesthetic
into three pelvic ligaments, the sacroiliac, sacrospinous and sacrotuberous,
abolishing referred painful symptoms.
3.3 Periosteal Trigger Points
3.3.1 Kellgren[45] injected hypertonic saline
into the periosteum producing painful referred symptoms.
3.3.2 Saunders [46] reported on 160 experiments
designed to describe the nature of pain referred from deep tissue structures
such as the periosteum. Noxious stimulation included; scratching it with a
needle, injecting it with 6% salt solution, or by applying a measured pressure.
All of these stimulations produced severe referred painful symptoms which
ranged in intensity and distance of projection based on strength of stimulus.
When these periosteal or ligamentous attachments were repeatedly stimulated a
consistent pattern of referred pain emerged.
Autonomic reactions, such as sweating, blanching, and nausea were
subjectively reported by research subjects.
3.3.3 Gross[47] reinforced the observation
that the deep periosteal structures refer pain,
3.3.4 Lawrence[48] injected a local anesthetic
into periosteal TPs, which relieved painful symptoms.
3.4 Vasoconstriction due to over stimulation of sympathetic nerve
fibers.
3.4.1 Gutstein-Good wrote at least 12 papers between 1938[49] and 1957[50] repeatedly asserting that TPs
were a result of vasoconstriction due to an over stimulation of the sympathetic
fibers supplying the vessels.
3.4.2 Travell & Simons[51] “Increased Metabolism/Reduced Circulation -Sympathetic mediated
vasoconstriction is the most likely central feedback mechanism to maintain
restricted circulation. The fact that stimulation of muscle nociceptors
strongly activates y-motor efferents to the muscle spindles may contribute indirectly.
3.4.3 Travell & Simons[52] explain how acute overload or
repetitive stress may damage the muscle cells sarcoplasmic reticulum resulting
in release of its stored calcium and sustained contracture. The body could respond with severe local vasoconstriction.
“There is now a region of increased metabolism with decreased circulation and
the muscle fibers passing through that region are strongly shortened
independent of propagated action potentials. “ This model may not however
explain the underlying process of the formation of trigger points in
non-muscular tissue such as ligaments and periosteal tissue.
3.4.4 Revis[53] describes the vasoconstriction
found in reflex sympathetic dystrophy which may be instructive of a similar
process found in myofascial trigger points.
“In healthy patients, a sympathetic response to injury occurs, with
vasoconstriction designed to prevent blood loss and swelling. This initial
response soon subsides and gives way to vasodilatation and increased capillary
permeability, allowing tissue repair. In patients with RSD, this sympathetic
response continues unabated. The reasons for the perpetuation of the response
is not known but may be related to central dysregulation of nociceptive
impulses. This dysregulation may be mediated by wide dynamic range neurons in
the spinal cord. Prolonged ischemia from the vasoconstriction produces more
pain, establishing a reflex arc that promotes further sympathetic discharge and
vasospasm.”
3.5 Prevalence of
Inflammation/Subluxation as a cause of pain
3.5.1 A Chronic Pain[54] web site sums up a
subscriber’s opinion (Mike) (last name
withheld) of inflammation and Chronic pain “During medical and other therapy
training programs, we are taught that repetitive strain injury causes
inflammation of the overused tissues.”….” Most of the time, however, the
primary pathology resulting from repetitive strain injury is not inflammation,
but rather it is myofascial pain generated primarily from trigger points in the
injured muscles.”
3.5.2 Barrett[55] “Many chiropractors have claimed
that spinal misalignments cause or contribute to disease by choking off
"nerve energy" to body tissues.”…” The conditions often have nothing
to do with a patient's symptoms and are not changed by chiropractic treatment.”
3.5.3 The National Association for Chiropractic Medicine (NACM) states in their Web Site[56] “The first and foremost
requirement for membership in the NACM is that a Doctor of Chiropractic
Medicine renounce the chiropractic hypothesis and/or philosophy; that is, the
tenets upon which their scope of practice is based.”….” The original
chiropractic hypothesis, stated simply, is that "Subluxation is the cause
of disease."”…” Because the hypothesis has found no validity in
universally accepted, peer-reviewed, published scientific journals, belief
in the hypothesis, then, is essentially theosophy. Science has not found any
organ system pathology which "adjustment" or "manipulation"
of spinal joint structures has effect; that is, no disease or
"dis-ease" process is affected.”
3.6 Prevalence, Severity and
Cost
3.6.1 Sola et al.[57] Among 200 unselected, asymptomatic young
adults. Focal tenderness representing
latent TPs in 54% of the female, and 45% of the male subjects. Referred pain
was demonstrated in 5% of these subjects.
3.6.2 Travell & Simons[58] state that pain from TPs can match the severity of a heart attack.
“The severity of symptoms ranges from painless restriction, to agonizing
incapacitating pain”
3.7 Implications of Research
3.7.1
4.1 Research Questions
4.1.1 Do chemical irritants cause referred pain?
4.1.2 Do chemical irritants refer in patterns similar to the referral
patterns of ligament and tendon irritation?
4.1.3 Does the sympathetic nervous system cause vasoconstriction
subsequent to novel, repetitive, or over activity?
4.1.4 Do the waste products of cell metabolism cause referred pain?
4.1.5 Do inflammatory chemicals irritate afferent nerve fibers?
4.1.6 Do patients symptoms reduce significantly more when treatment is
applied to clinically active areas than when massage treatment is applied
gernerally?
4.2 Proposed Medical Research Hypothesis, Design and Methodology
4.2.1 Chemical Irritants injected into the end attachments of ligaments
and tendons cause referred phenomena in predictable and observable patterns
with attendant dysfunction, which is abolished by anesthetic injection.
4.2.1.1
Research Design and Methodology
4.2.1.1.1
Hypertonic saline solution (0.1-0.3 ml of 6%) injected into
ligament and tendon attachments near where they attach to the bone. Muscle
testing, Trigger Point examination, Postural examination and Grid Data
recording sheets are used to determine the path and nature of referral
phenomena. These paths are compared with predictable and observable patterns
(dermatomally, sclerotomally, myotomally, and extrasegmentally) and with
expected symptoms. (headaches, muscle weakness, trigger points, postural
dysfunction, sweating, blanching, and nausea, (sometimes referred Cutaneous
Paresthesia and numbness instead of deep pain)). 2% lidocaine (Xylocaine) with
triamcinolone or other comparable anesthetic is injected into the treatment
area and the above examintion and recording protocols are used and analysis of
results provided.
4.2.2 Chemical Irritants injected into the end attachments of ligaments
and tendons cause referred phenomena in predictable and observable patterns
with attendant dysfunction, which is abolished by massage therapy.
4.2.2.1
Research Design and Methodology
4.2.2.1.1
Hypertonic saline solution (0.1-0.3 ml of 6%) injected into
ligament and tendon attachments near where they attach to the bone. Muscle
testing, Trigger Point examination, Postural examination and Grid Data
recording sheets are used to determine the path and nature of referral
phenomena. These paths are compared with predictable and observable patterns
(dermatomally, sclerotomally, myotomally, and extrasegmentally) and with
expected symptoms. (headaches, muscle weakness, trigger points, postural
dysfunction, sweating, blanching, and nausea, (sometimes referred Cutaneous
Paresthesia and numbness instead of deep pain)). Massage therapy (Ischemic
compression or similar technique) is applied to the treatment area. The above
examination and recording protocols are used and analysis of results provided.
4.2.3 The sympathetic nervous system causes vasoconstriction of the
vessels surrounding the clinically affected area subsequent to novel, overly
repetitive, or over activity
4.2.3.1
Research Design and Methodology
4.2.3.1.1
Subjects perform exercises (novel, repetitive and or overly
intense activity), which stress ligaments and or tendons of a predefined
clinical area. The rate at which radioactive NaI is eliminated from tissue in
the clinically affected area is measured. Prolongation of the resorption rate
of the isotope, which is due to impaired local circulation will be noted.
4.2.4 Prolonged exercise (novel, overly repetitive, or over activity)
results in the production of inflammatory chemicals and vasodilation of the
clinically affected areas. These irritated tissues refer in predictable and observable
patterns.
4.2.4.1
Research Design and Methodology
4.2.4.1.1
Sedentary Subjects are given prolonged exercise and skin
conductance studies are performed on clinically affected areas. Notation is
made regarding conductance rates and is compared to surrounding areas. Pain and
or sensation referral patterns are also recorded.
4.3 Proposed Patient Research, Hypothesis, Design and Methodology
4.3.1 Project # 1
4.3.1.1
Hypothesis
4.3.1.1.1
Localization and treatment (Ischemic Compression) of specific
sites of vasoconstriction and or vasodilation (Inflammation) will correlate
highly with reduced subjective reports of pain.
4.3.1.2
Research Design and Methodology
4.3.1.2.1
Randomised post exertion pain patient selection, clinical
assessment completed to determine discrete areas of vasoconstriction (Ischemia)
and or inflammation (Vasodilation), Pre treatment pain rating obtained from
patients and statistically compared with post treatment pain rating for
treatment effects.
4.3.2 Project # 2
4.3.2.1
Hypothesis
4.3.2.1.1
Localization and treatment (Ischemic Compression) of specific
sites of vasoconstriction and or vasodilation (Inflammation) is more effective
than circulatory massage to the general area.
4.3.2.2
Research Design and Methodology
4.3.2.2.1
Two groups of randomised post exertion pain patient are
selected, clinical assessment completed to determine discrete areas of
vasoconstriction (Ischemia) and or inflammation (Vasodilation), Pre treatment
pain rating obtained from patients in both groups and statistically compared
with post treatment pain rating for treatment effects. The statistical outcomes
of both groups are then compared and the results noted.
5.1.1
5.2 Rating Scales
5.2.1
Sensation Intensity
5.2.1.1
No Sensation 0
5.2.1.2
Mild Sensation 1-3
5.2.1.3
Discomforting 3-5
5.2.1.4
Distressing 5-7
5.2.1.5
Horrible 7-9
5.2.1.6
Excruciating 9-10
5.3 Single Case Single Visit (Anecdotal) Studies
5.3.1 Plantar Foot
5.3.1.1
Cell Stress/Death of Superficial &
Intrinsic Foot Structures at Calcaneal & Metatarsal Attachments
5.3.1.1.1
Study Title
5.3.1.1.1.1 “Single Case Single Visit Outcome (Anecdotal)
Study-Plantar Foot-Superficial & Intrinsic Foot Structure Attachments -The
Treatment Effects of Compression and Stretching.”
5.3.1.1.2.1 Patient Selection
5.3.1.1.2.1.1
Pre-screening
5.3.1.1.2.1.1.1
EXCLUDE
5.3.1.1.2.1.1.1.1
Lumbar Pathology, Lumbar Pain, Early AM Heal Pain, Achilles
Tendonitis and Sedentary (40-60 yr old) recently active women
5.3.1.1.2.1.1.2
CAN INCLUDE
5.3.1.1.2.1.1.2.1
Frequent Weight Bearing Activities, Wear Shoes w/ Elevated
Heals, and Plantar Foot Tenderness(Right Foot) (Palpation Plantar Foot)
5.3.1.1.2.1.1.3
MUST
INCLUDE
5.3.1.1.2.1.1.3.1
Achilles Tendon Tenderness (Right Foot) (Palpation Achilles Tendon)
5.3.1.1.2.2 Treatment
Technique and Sensation Intensity Rating
5.3.1.1.2.2.1
Pre-Treatment Rating (0-10) (Sensation Intensity Rating Scale) using 3 lbs
pincer (pinching) pressure along Achilles Tendon (Right & Left Foot) (Palpation Achilles Tendon)
5.3.1.1.2.2.2
Compression and Stretching Treatment at (Right Foot) Calcaneal Tuberosity (Medial &
Lateral Process), bases of the 2nd-5th metatarsals, and
between the Proximal Heads of the Metatarsal bones (Technique Plantar Foot) (Alternate Technique)
5.3.1.1.2.2.3
Post-Treatment Rating
(0-10) (Sensation
Intensity Rating Scale) using 3 lbs
pincer (pinching) pressure along Achilles Tendon (Right Foot) (Palpation Achilles Tendon)
5.3.1.1.3
Illustrations
5.3.1.1.4
Observation
5.3.1.1.4.1 I noticed that my
clients who did a lot of weight bearing exercise had a lot of tenderness in
their achilles tendon, which would diminish with treatment to the plantar
aponeurosis and ligament attachments. Further, I noticed the same population
tended to develop increased pathology in the plantar foot structures (plantar
aponeurosis, long and short plantar ligament ect) I wondered if early treatment
could help prevent later pathological developments. After considerable reading
of the literature I wondered if at the early stages at least either trigger
points or perhaps some metabolic dysfunction was the cause and if so increasing
circulation thru massage should help. So I decided to do an anecdotal study.
One treatment of pressure (thumb, finger, knuckle=Significant amount of
pressure=3-4 lbs or more) to four locations with foot movement as indicated to
each client. Treatment
5.3.1.1.5
Rationale for Single Case Studies
5.3.1.1.5.1 The massage
therapy profession does not have a boatload, bundle or even a small packet of
money for research relative to the pharmaceutical industry for example. Single
case single visit out come studies are cheap and easy to do, don’t take a lot
of time (15-20 Minutes) and although unscientific by definition (Anecdotal)
provide an abundance of useful data which may direct more controlled scientific
study. This is like the fashion model photographers’ Polaroid (To check
lighting & photogenics before more expensive film is used) or the legal
equivalent to prima facie inquiry when the rules of law are loosened to allow
legally prohibitive facts in as evidence to assess criminality. Single case
outcome studies don’t prove or disprove anything but protocols and statistical
methods can be tested and may later serve as useful tools in subsequent more
controlled scientific research. This project will further increase the body of
knowledge necessary to establish a scientific basis for massage therapy
treatments and act as a counterweight to the notion that massage treatment is
palliative without curative value.
5.3.1.1.6
Rational for the Theoretical Perspective and Study of Tendon
and Ligament Trigger Points
5.3.1.1.6.1 Travell[59] offers a
theoretical perspective as to why muscle tissue and its associated deep fascia
(FASH-ē-a; fascia=bandage) (Dense (Collagenous) Connective
Tissue-Irregularly Arranged around muscles) develops a hyperirritable focal
point (Trigger Point) within a taut band of skeletal muscle fibers. This
theory, explains why Myofascial Trigger Points may develop in muscle tissue,
but it does not explain how trigger points could develop in its associated
fascia. Nor does her trigger point manual discuss the location or pain referral
patterns of deep Fascial (surrounding muscles) trigger points. Although
existence of tendon and ligament trigger points are acknowledged by Travell
their location and pain referral patterns are only discussed in relation to the
research of others and their location and pain referral patterns are never
discussed in detail. The purpose of the following theoretical perspective and
subsequent study is to explain the nature of tendon and ligament trigger points
and examine the efficacy of clinical massage therapy as a viable curative
treatment.
5.3.1.1.7.1
The facial, Ligamentous, and tendon structures of the foot
undergo enormous weight bearing forces especially for individuals who are on
their feet a lot, engage in sports activities such as walking, running or
hiking, or wear elevated heals. The forces of weight bearing also place
pressure on the vessels that supply blood to the tissues. The transport of
essential cell nutrition (O2, glucose and protein) to the tendon and connective
tissue cells may be diminished and or interrupted. Cell stress and or death may
ensue along with concomitant nerve irritation and referred sensory phenomena.
With cell stress, enzymatic messengers may initiate a reflex arc (afferent and
efferent sympathetic nerve fibres) causing vasoconstriction, increased
metabolite concentration, and further nerve irritation. With cell death
enzymatic messengers may initiate the production of inflammatory nerve
irritants which refer sensory phenomena segmentally (Dermatomes ALL, Dermatomes
L1-S3 Front, Dermatomes
L1-S4 Back) and extra-segmentally (Extrasegmental
Referral). The tendon and connective tissue cells near the bone
or at biomechanical stress points may be most affected due greater mechanical
stresses and diminished blood supply. (Hume’s Fork, Cell
Stress/Death of Intrinsic Foot Structures-Direction of Pressure, Muscle Bone
Attachments-Foot Plantar Right, Bones Foot
Plantar Surface, Plantar
Aponeurosis (Fascia) Illustrated, Plantar
Aponeurosis (Fascia) Picture) These
Pre-Acute, Acute, and or Chronic conditions if left untreated may have a
cascading effect which contribute to clinical conditions e.g.; postural faults
Trigger Points and or Plantar Fasciitis. It is unlikely that the usual
laboratory measures eg sed rates (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]),
radiography, MRI, and or neurological testing will reveal these sub clinical
phenomena. It is expected that a high percentage of active patient populations
without lumbar or other pathology will present with these conditions and thus
provide a fertile field of study. Ischemic compression and stretching have
proven effective in the treatment of trigger points and may help re-establish
circulation, help remove metabolic and or inflammatory irritants and improve
the transport of essential cell nutrition (O2, glucose and protein) to the
tendon and connective tissue cells aforementioned. (Research
Summary) This may have a curative effect and help prevent
potential clinical pathology (Plantar Fasciitis, postural faults, and or
trigger points), athletic injuries, impaired activities of daily living (ADL),
and or impaired athletic performance.
5.3.1.1.8
Hypothesis
5.3.1.1.8.1
Hypothesis Defined
5.3.1.1.8.1.1 If
a theory is the analysis of a set of speculative facts in their relation to one
another with the hope of answering the WHY questions a hypothesis is concise
statement in order to draw out and test the theories logical or empirical
consequences. In this plantar foot study if the theory states that connective
tissue cell stress/death produces neurological irritation and increasing
circulation reduces that irritation and provides lasting curative relief then
the referred Achilles tendon tenderness should decrease with treatments that
increase circulation to these connective tissue structures. Further once
circulation is re-established a lasting curative effect in the form of reduced
Achilles tendon tenderness should persist without treatment.
5.3.1.1.8.2
Plantar Foot Study Hypothesis-Single Visit
5.3.1.1.8.2.1 Compression
and stretching of the connective tissue structures of the plantar foot will
significantly reduce Achilles tendon tenderness as subjectively reported by clients.
5.3.1.1.8.3
Plantar Foot Study Hypothesis-Multiple Visit
5.3.1.1.8.3.1 Subsequent
treatment (Compression and stretching of plantar foot connective tissues)
visits will continue to reduce Achilles tendon tenderness as subjectively
reported by clients. This reduced Achilles tendon tenderness will persist even
after treatment is discontinued.
5.3.1.1.9
Protocol Detailed (Summary)
5.3.1.1.9.1 Patient Selection
5.3.1.1.9.1.1 Pre-screening
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1
EXCLUDE
the following clients from the study
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1.1
Persons with known lumbar pathology and or lumbar pain.
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1.2 These conditions can
refer sensory phenomena including pain into the foot along the L4-5 and S1-2
dermatomes (Dermatomes ALL)
and will not respond to treatment of the superficial & intrinsic
structures. It would then be impossible to judge the effects of treatment as
referred pain from the lumbar region would persist.
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1.3
Persons with Early AM Heal Pain
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1.4 This is a symptom marker
for Plantar
Fasciitis, which is a clinical condition that underlies
pathology that is more serious. Although this condition may respond to the compression
and stretching treatments the focus of the current study is on the treatment
effects on sub clinical conditions.
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1.5
Persons with Achilles Tendonitis
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1.6 Persons who have a
current or past Diagnosis of Achilles
Tendonitis will not respond to this treatment. You can suspect
Achilles Tendonitis in persons who are overweight and flatfooted or who are
long distance runners. These persons should also be excluded from this study.
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1.7
Sedentary (40-60 yr old) women recently engaged in novel,
repetitive or over activity involving walking, standing and or running.
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.1.8 According to Travell[60] sedentary, middle-aged women (40-60 years old) who
have recently engaged in novel, repetitive or over activity (walking, standing,
and or running) are prone to develop trigger points. Activities such as
walking, standing and or running may cause injury to the muscle cells of the
Soleus and Tibialis posterior, which can refer pain and tenderness into the
Achilles tendon. Since Active patients can still develop trigger points in
these lower leg muscles subsequent studies may help determine their numbers. Trigger Point
Study
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.2
CAN
INCLUDE the following clients in the study
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.2.1
Persons who engage in Frequent Weight Bearing Activities
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.2.2 These clients are more
likely to place greater stress on the tissues in question and manifest sub
clinical symptoms. Sedentary clients who have symptoms especially those clients
who are overweight may have other conditions such as diabetes, deep vein
thrombosis ect which will not respond to treatment.
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.2.3
Persons who Wear Shoes w/ Elevated Heals
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.2.4 Greater stresses are
placed on the plantar foot structures when clients wear high-healed shoes.
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.2.5
Persons who have Plantar Foot Tenderness (Right Foot) (Palpation
Plantar Foot)
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.2.6 This area may be
palpated to establish connective tissue irritation near the Proximal Heads of
the Metatarsal bones, which refers extrasegmentally and dermatomally into the
plantar surface of the foot.
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.3
MUST
INCLUDE the following clients in the study
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.3.1
Persons who have Achilles Tendon Tenderness (Right Foot) (Palpation
Achilles Tendon)
5.3.1.1.9.1.1.3.2 This area is palpated to
determine pre and post treatment ratings. Generally, connective tissue
attachments near Calcaneal Tuberosity (Medial Process) refer into the Achilles
Tendon, extrasegmentally and dermatomally.
5.3.1.1.9.2 Treatment
Technique and Sensation Intensity Rating
5.3.1.1.9.2.1 Pre-Treatment
Rating
5.3.1.1.9.2.1.1
3 lbs pincer (pinching) pressure along Achilles Tendon. (Right & Left Foot)
(Palpation
Achilles Tendon)
5.3.1.1.9.2.1.1.1
The amount of pressure can be roughly gauged by pinching a
bathroom scale with your thumb and forefinger until you reach 3 lbs pressure.
Then pinch the Achilles tendon (Right & Left Foot) of
the client and ask them to rate the sensation using the Sensation
Intensity Rating Scale. (0-10) Be sure to label the left and right foot
ratings. For example L=4 R=5.
5.3.1.1.9.2.1.1.2
Sensation rating of above 1 will be selected for the study and
those persons with ratings below 1 will be excluded from the study.
5.3.1.1.9.2.2 Compression
and Stretching Treatment (Technique Plantar Foot)
5.3.1.1.9.2.2.1
Standard Technique (Right Foot ONLY)
5.3.1.1.9.2.2.1.1
Pressure is directed against the Calcaneal Tuberosity and just
anterior (Medial & Lateral
Process), calcaneal plantar surface, bases of the 2nd-5th
metatarsals (Right Foot), with foot Dorsiflexion, and between the Proximal Heads of the Metatarsal
bones, with toe extension. Treatment continues until Achilles Tendon tenderness
subsides. (Technique Plantar Foot)
5.3.1.1.9.2.2.2
Alternate Technique Hand Position
5.3.1.1.9.2.2.2.1
The technique demonstrated in the picture (Technique
Plantar Foot) can be altered to suit individual therapist
preferences. For example separated fingers can be used against the bony
processes with foot dorsiflexion while the client is in the supine
position. If the client is prone using
the same or more comfortable finger position the foot is dorsiflexed while the
leg is flexed at the knee.
5.3.1.1.9.2.3 Post-Treatment
Rating
5.3.1.1.9.2.3.1
3 lbs pincer (pinching) pressure along Achilles Tendon. (Right Foot) (Palpation
Achilles Tendon)
5.3.1.1.9.2.3.1.1
The amount of pressure can be roughly gauged by pinching a
bathroom scale with your thumb and forefinger until you reach 3 lbs pressure.
Then pinch the Achilles tendon (Right Foot) of the
client and ask them to rate the sensation using the Sensation
Intensity Rating Scale. (0-10)
5.3.1.2
Plantar Foot Study Conducted June/July
2002
5.3.1.2.1
Study Title
5.3.1.2.1.1 “Single Case Single Visit Outcome (Anecdotal)
Study-Plantar Foot-Superficial & Intrinsic Foot Structure Attachments -The
Treatment Effects of Compression and Stretching. June/July 2002”
5.3.1.2.3
Rationale
5.3.1.2.4
Theoretical Thinking
5.3.1.2.5
Protocol Detailed (Summary)
5.3.1.2.6
Analysis of Study
5.3.1.2.6.1 The t Score of 12.01912473,
which assesses whether the means of two groups are statistically different from
one another is more than the expected critical value at alpha .001= 3.46455.
The average reduction in tenderness of the tendon was 62%. This strongly
suggests that the treatment alone and or some other factor such as placebo or
gate effect is responsible for the decrease in the Achilles’ tendon palpation
tenderness. In either case the difference between pre and posttest means was
significant and the null hypothesis can be rejected. The correlation
coefficient (r (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient)) between pre
and posttest scores was 0.395997391. This allows us to correctly predict scores
along a regression line 16% (Coefficient of Determination (COD)) of the time,
which is significantly better than guessing (9%). If this were a
better-designed study (randomized groups, control groups ect) over a large
population of clients, this would be a significant result. Since this is not
the case, the treatment effectiveness cannot be confirmed. Perhaps the
statistical measure for such a small study is faulty. If you would like to
volunteer your statistical expertise, click this link. Web Site Help Since this study was done by a
single practitioner it will be interesting to see what results a multiple
practitioner single case study will produce. In this study, (June/July 2002)
since clients were expecting some type of treatment for their Achilles’ tendon
tenderness that expectation (placebo effect) alone may be responsible for some
or all of the treatment effect. If research progresses this factor should be
considered in the Research Design and Methodology (RDM). In addition, since the
treatment may be mildly or moderately discomforting to the client the strength
of that signal may initiate a neurological gate (gate effect), which blocks any
sensitivity from the Achilles’ tendon. The Gate effect alone may be responsible
for some or all of the treatment effect. The Gate effect should be factored out
as a treatment effect in future Research Design and Methodology. Still with
such a strong treatment effect we are probably looking at some measure of
treatment efficacy. Longitudinal studies where one patient is followed over
time should reveal whether patients Achilles’ tendon tenderness subsides after
several treatments and then remains less sensitive even without treatment. My
own anecdotal patient notes demonstrate this finding.
5.3.1.2.7
Excel Worksheet for Plantar Study
5.3.1.2.8
Discussion of Statistics
5.3.1.2.9
Visualization of Research Data
5.3.1.2.9.1 Box Diamond &
Dot Plot
5.3.1.2.9.2 Pre Session Rating
Frequency Distribution
5.3.1.2.9.3 Post Session
Rating Frequency Distribution
5.3.1.2.9.4 Theoretical
Sampling Distribution Of The Mean Pre Session
5.3.1.2.9.5 Theoretical
Sampling Distribution Of The Mean Post session
5.3.1.2.9.6 Sampling
Distribution Of Differences Between Means
5.3.1.2.9.7 Frequency Polygon
Pre-Session
5.3.1.2.9.8 Frequency Polygon
Post-Session
5.3.1.2.9.9 Normal Probability
Plot
5.3.1.2.9.10
Quantile-Quantile Plot
5.3.1.2.9.11
Scatter Plot
5.3.1.2.9.12
Simple Regression
5.3.1.2.9.13
Bayes Residuals
5.3.1.2.9.14
Influence Plot
5.3.1.2.9.15
ANOVA
(partial) regression plot
5.3.1.2.9.16
Residuals
Plot-Univariate Analysis
5.3.2 Soleus and Tibialis Posterior Trigger Points
5.3.2.1
Study Title
5.3.2.1.1
“Single
Case Single Visit Outcome (Anecdotal) Study-Soleus and Tibialis Posterior
Trigger Points -The Treatment Effects of Ischemic Compression and Stretching.”
5.3.2.2
Information on Trigger Points
5.3.2.3
Summary of Protocol Trigger Point (Detailed)
5.3.2.3.1
Patient Selection
5.3.2.3.1.1 Pre-screening
5.3.2.3.1.1.1 EXCLUDE
5.3.2.3.1.1.1.1
Lumbar Pathology, Lumbar Pain, Early AM Heal Pain, Achilles
Tendonitis, and Sedentary (40-60 yr old) recently active women
5.3.2.3.1.1.2 CAN
INCLUDE
5.3.2.3.1.1.2.1
Frequent Weight Bearing Activities, Wear Shoes w/ Elevated
Heals, and Plantar Foot Tenderness (Palpation
Plantar Foot) (Right Foot)
5.3.2.3.1.1.3 MUST INCLUDE
5.3.2.3.1.1.3.1
Achilles Tendon Tenderness (Right Foot) (Palpation
Achilles Tendon)
5.3.2.3.1.1.3.2
Persons who have Exquisite, focal tenderness in Trigger Points
(TP1) (Right Foot) of either the Soleus
(Soleus) (Soleus
Trigger Points) and or the Tibialis Posterior (Tibialis
Posterior) (Tibialis
Posterior Trigger Points)
5.3.2.3.1.2 Treatment
Technique and Sensation Intensity Rating
5.3.2.3.1.2.1 Pre-Treatment
Rating (0-10) (Sensation Intensity Rating Scale)
using 3 lbs pincer (pinching) pressure along Achilles Tendon (Right Foot) (Palpation
Achilles Tendon)
5.3.2.3.1.2.2 Flat
& Pincer palpation Assessment, Ischemic Compression and Stretching
Treatment Soleus and Tibialis Posterior (TP1) (Right Foot)
5.3.2.3.1.2.3 Post-Treatment Rating (0-10) (Sensation
Intensity Rating Scale) using 3 lbs pincer (pinching) pressure along
Achilles Tendon (Right Foot) (Palpation
Achilles Tendon)
5.3.2.4
Illustrations
5.3.2.5
Rationale for Trigger Point Study
5.3.2.5.1
The Soleus and Tibialis Posterior muscles both refer into the
Achilles Tendon and thus may be responsible for some of this tendons tenderness
in active clients. According to Travell both sexes and all ages can develop TPs
but it is sedentary, middle-aged women who engage in novel, repetitive or over
activity that are especially vulnerable. It is expected then that the active
patients of the plantar foot studies would have fewer though significant Soleus
and Tibialis posterior trigger points. Knowing the % of active patients which
were included in the previous plantar foot
studies with this condition may be useful. This knowledge
may help establish a combination of plantar foot and muscle trigger point
therapies to treat both sub-clinical and clinical pathologies such as plantar
Fasciitis. Knowing the % of active patients with Soleus and Tibialis Posterior
trigger points may also explain the weak treatment response of some patients in
the previous plantar foot studies.
5.3.2.6
Theoretical Thinking
5.3.2.7
Protocol Trigger Point Detailed (Summary)
5.3.2.7.1.1 Patient Selection
5.3.2.7.1.1.1 Pre-screening
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1
EXCLUDE
the following clients from the study
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1.1
Persons with known lumbar pathology and or lumbar pain.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1.2 These conditions can
refer sensory phenomena including pain into the foot along the L4-5 and S1-2
dermatomes (Dermatomes ALL) and will not
respond to treatment of the superficial & intrinsic structures. It would
then be impossible to judge the effects of treatment as referred pain from the
lumbar region would persist.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1.3
Persons with Early AM Heal Pain
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1.4 This is a symptom marker
for Plantar
Fasciitis, which is a clinical condition that
underlies pathology that is more serious. Although this condition may respond
to the compression and stretching treatments the focus of the current study is
on the treatment effects on sub clinical conditions.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1.5
Persons with Achilles Tendonitis
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1.6 Persons who have a
current or past Diagnosis of Achilles
Tendonitis will not respond to this treatment. You can
suspect Achilles Tendonitis in persons who are overweight and flatfooted or who
are long distance runners. These persons should also be excluded from this
study.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1.7
Sedentary (40-60 yr old) women recently engaged in novel,
repetitive or over activity involving walking, standing and or running.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.1.8 According to Travell [61] sedentary, middle-aged women (40-60 years
old) who have recently engaged in novel, repetitive or over activity (walking,
standing, and or running) are prone to develop trigger points. Activities such
as walking, standing and or running may cause injury to the muscle cells of the
Soleus and Tibialis posterior, which can refer pain and tenderness into the
Achilles tendon. Since the previous plantar foot studies could include active
patients who may also have trigger points by excluding sedentary recently
active women we can determine how many of our active patients in the previous
study may have Soleus and Tibialis trigger points which could account for weak
response to treatment and or suggest combined treatments for increased
effectiveness.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.2
CAN
INCLUDE the following clients in the study
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.2.1
Persons who engage in Frequent Weight Bearing Activities
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.2.2 These clients are more
likely to place greater stress on the tissues in question and manifest sub
clinical symptoms. Sedentary clients who have symptoms especially those clients
who are overweight may have other conditions such as diabetes, deep vein
thrombosis ect which will not respond to treatment.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.2.3
Persons who Wear Shoes w/ Elevated Heals
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.2.4 Greater stresses are
placed on the plantar foot structures when clients wear high-healed shoes.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.2.5
Persons who have Plantar Foot Tenderness (Palpation
Plantar Foot ) (Right Foot)
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.2.6 This area may be
palpated to establish connective tissue irritation near the Proximal Heads of
the Metatarsal bones, which refers extrasegmentally and dermatomally into the
plantar surface of the foot.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.3
MUST
INCLUDE the following clients in the study
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.3.1
Persons who have Achilles Tendon Tenderness (Right Foot) (Palpation Achilles Tendon)
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.3.2 This area is palpated to
determine pre and post treatment ratings.
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.3.3
Persons who have Exquisite, focal tenderness in Trigger Points
of either the (TP1)
(Right Foot)
Soleus (Soleus) (Soleus Trigger Points) and or the
Tibialis Posterior (Tibialis Posterior) (Tibialis Posterior Trigger Points)
5.3.2.7.1.1.1.3.4 Since both of these
muscles refer into the Achilles tendon, it is necessary to locate these trigger
points to provide treatment.
5.3.2.7.1.2
Assessment, Treatment Technique and Sensation Intensity Rating
5.3.2.7.1.2.1
Pre-Treatment Rating
5.3.2.7.1.2.1.1
3 lbs pincer (pinching) pressure along Achilles Tendon. (Right Foot) (Palpation Achilles Tendon)
5.3.2.7.1.2.1.1.1
The amount of pressure can be roughly gauged by pinching a
bathroom scale with your thumb and forefinger until you reach 3 lbs pressure.
Then pinch the Achilles tendon (Right Foot) of
the client and ask them to rate the sensation using the Sensation Intensity Rating Scale.
(0-10)
5.3.2.7.1.2.1.1.2
Sensation rating of above 1 will be selected for the study and
those persons with ratings below 1 will be excluded from the study.
5.3.2.7.1.2.2
Flat & Pincer palpation Assessment, Ischemic Compression
and Stretching Treatment Soleus and Tibialis Posterior (TP1) (Right Foot)
5.3.2.7.1.2.2.1
Establish existence of Exquisite, focal tenderness (Trigger
Points in the Soleus and Tibialis Posterior
5.3.2.7.1.2.2.1.1
Soleus
5.3.2.7.1.2.2.1.2 Locate TP1 (Soleus Trigger Points) in the
Soleus (Soleus) using flat palpation
or pincer
palpation
5.3.2.7.1.2.2.1.3
Tibialis Posterior
5.3.2.7.1.2.2.1.4 Locate TP1 (Tibialis Posterior Trigger Points)
in the Tibialis Posterior (Tibialis Posterior)
5.3.2.7.1.2.2.1.5 To locate the Tibialis
Posterior Trigger Points it is necessary to push the gastrocnemius aside from a
lateral or medial direction and apply flat palpation thru the Soleus
muscle to the trigger points of the Tibialis posterior
5.3.2.7.1.2.2.2
Ischemic Compression and Stretching Treatment (TP1) (Right Foot)
5.3.2.7.1.2.2.2.1
Ischemic Compression is applied to TP1 of both the Soleus and
Tibialis Posterior with foot Dorsiflexion. Treatment continues until Achilles
Tendon tenderness subsides.
5.3.2.7.1.2.3
Post-Treatment Rating
5.3.2.7.1.2.3.1
3 lbs pincer (pinching) pressure along Achilles Tendon. (Right Foot) (Palpation Achilles Tendon)
5.3.2.7.1.2.3.1.1
The amount of pressure can be roughly gauged by pinching a
bathroom scale with your thumb and forefinger until you reach 3 lbs pressure.
Then pinch the Achilles tendon (Right Foot) of
the client and ask them to rate the sensation using the Sensation Intensity Rating Scale.
(0-10)
5.4
Single Case Multiple Visit (Anecdotal)
Studies
5.4.1 Plantar Foot
5.4.1.1
Cell Stress/Death of Superficial &
Intrinsic Foot Structures at Calcaneal & Metatarsal Attachments
5.4.1.1.1
Study Title
5.4.1.1.4.1 There are 5
additional visits added to the multiple visit outcome study.
5.4.1.1.4.2 Four of these
visits contain the same components as the single visit study e.g. Pre-Rating,
Treatment, and Post-Rating.
5.4.1.1.4.3 The time spacing
between the first and subsequent visits (2-5) should be between 2 and 3 days
with no more than 3 days between treatments.
5.4.1.1.4.4 The last visit
(Visit # 6) contains only a final rating of both the (Right & Left Foot) with NO PRE-RATING or
TREATMENT component. Be sure to label the left and right foot
ratings. For example L=4 R=5.
5.4.1.1.4.5 The time spacing
between the fifth and sixth visit should be exactly 7 days.
5.4.1.1.5.1 The single case
single visit study does not tell us the following.
5.4.1.1.5.1.1 Gate
Effect- since the treatment may be mildly or moderately discomforting to
the client the strength of that signal may initiate a neurological gate (gate
effect) which blocks any sensitivity from the Achilles’ tendon. My own
anecdotal patient notes seem to indicate the Gate Effect lasts between 2-3
days.
5.4.1.1.5.1.2 Placebo
Effect- Since clients were expecting some type of treatment for their
Achilles’ tendon tenderness that expectation (placebo effect) alone may be
responsible for some or all of the treatment effect. My own anecdotal patient
notes seem to indicate the Placebo Effect lasts between 2-3 days.
5.4.1.1.5.1.3 Curative
Effect-Depending on the severity of the pre-acute. Acute or chronic
irritation it may take several treatments to re-establish circulation to the
affected connective tissue cells. These treatment effects can only be measured
with a multiple visit study. In addition, the 7 days between the 5th
and 6th visit allows for the diminution of the Gate and Placebo
effect so that the more lasting curative effect can be measured.
5.4.2 Soleus and Tibialis Posterior Trigger Points
5.4.2.1.1
Study Title
5.4.2.1.1.1 “Single Case Multiple Visit Outcome (Anecdotal) Study-
Soleus and Tibialis Posterior Trigger Points -The Treatment Effects of Ischemic
Compression and Stretching.”
5.4.2.1.4
Subsequent Visit Protocol Trigger Point Multiple Visit Study
5.4.2.1.4.1 There are 5
additional visits added to the Multiple visit outcome study.
5.4.2.1.4.2 Four of these
visits contain the same components as the single visit study e.g. Pre-Rating,
Treatment, and Post-Rating.
5.4.2.1.4.3 The time spacing
between the first and subsequent visits (2-5) should be between 2 and 3 days
with no more than 3 days between treatments.
5.4.2.1.4.4 The last visit
(Visit # 6) contains only a final rating with NO
PRE-RATING or TREATMENT component.
5.4.2.1.4.5 The time spacing
between the fifth and sixth visit should be exactly 7 days.
5.4.2.1.5
Rational for Subsequent Visits Trigger Point Multiple Visit
Study
5.4.2.1.5.1
The single case single visit study does not tell us the
following.
5.4.2.1.5.1.1
Gate Effect- since the treatment may be mildly or
moderately discomforting to the client the strength of that signal may initiate
a neurological gate (gate effect) which blocks any sensitivity from the
Achilles’ tendon. My own anecdotal patient notes seem to indicate the Gate
Effect lasts between 2-3 days.
5.4.2.1.5.1.2
Placebo Effect- Since clients were expecting some type
of treatment for their Achilles’ tendon tenderness that expectation (placebo
effect) alone may be responsible for some or all of the treatment effect. My
own anecdotal patient notes seem to indicate the Placebo Effect lasts between
2-3 days.
5.4.2.1.5.1.3
Curative Effect-Depending on the severity of the
pre-acute. Acute or chronic irritation it may take several treatments to
re-establish circulation to the affected connective tissue cells. These
treatment effects can only be measured with a multiple visit study. In
addition, the 7 days between the 5th and 6th visit allows
for the diminution of the Gate and Placebo effect so that the more lasting
curative effect can be measured.
6.1
Introduction
6.1.1
6.2
General Functional Anatomy and
Physiology
6.2.1
Introduction
6.2.1.1
6.2.2
Histology (hiss’-TOL-ō-jē;
histio=tissue; logos=study of)-
6.2.2.1
Connective Tissue
6.2.2.1.1
Introduction
6.2.2.1.1.1
6.2.2.1.2
Definitions
6.2.2.1.2.1
Fibroblast (FĪ-brō-blast)
6.2.2.1.2.1.1
6.2.2.1.2.2
Collagen (KOL-a-jen)
6.2.2.1.2.2.1
6.2.2.1.3
Connective Tissue Proper
6.2.2.1.3.1
Dense (Collagenous) Connective Tissue
6.2.2.1.3.1.1
Irregularly Arranged
6.2.2.1.3.1.1.1
6.2.2.1.3.1.2
Regularly Arranged
6.2.2.1.3.1.2.1
6.2.2.2
Muscle Tissue
6.2.2.2.1
Introduction
6.3
Plantar Foot and Posterior Heal
6.3.1 Functional Anatomy, Physiology, and Pathology
6.3.1.1
Introduction
6.3.1.1.1
6.3.1.2
Connective Tissue Structures
6.3.1.2.1
Plantar Aponeurosis (a-paw-neurosis)
6.3.1.2.1.1
6.3.1.2.2
Lateral Cord of the Plantar Aponeurosis
6.3.1.2.2.1
6.3.1.2.3
Plantar Fascia (fā-si-ă)
6.3.1.2.3.1
6.3.1.2.4
Plantar Ligaments
6.3.1.2.4.1
Long Plantar Ligament
6.3.1.2.4.1.1
6.3.1.2.4.2
Plantar Calcaneocuboid Ligament (Short Plantar Ligament)
6.3.1.2.4.2.1
6.3.1.2.4.3
Plantar Calcaneonavicular (Spring) Ligament
6.3.1.2.4.3.1
6.3.1.2.4.4
Retinaculum of foot/Fascia Around the Ankle
6.3.1.2.4.4.1
6.3.1.2.4.4.2
Laciniate Ligament
6.3.1.2.4.4.2.1
6.3.1.2.4.4.3
Peroneal Retinacula
6.3.1.2.4.4.3.1
6.3.1.2.4.5
Synovial (Mucous) Sheaths of the Tendons Around the Ankle
6.3.1.2.4.5.1
6.3.1.3
Foot and Toe Muscles
6.3.1.3.1
Introduction
6.3.1.3.1.1
6.3.1.3.2
Lateral (Peroneal) Compartment
6.3.1.3.2.1
6.3.1.3.2.2
Peroneus Brevis
6.3.1.3.2.2.1
6.3.1.3.2.3
Peroneus Longus
6.3.1.3.2.3.1
6.3.1.3.3
Posterior Compartment
6.3.1.3.3.1
6.3.1.3.3.2
Posterior Superficial Compartment
6.3.1.3.3.2.1
Gastrocnemius
6.3.1.3.3.2.1.1
6.3.1.3.3.2.2
Plantaris
6.3.1.3.3.2.2.1
6.3.1.3.3.2.3
Soleus
6.3.1.3.3.2.3.1
6.3.1.3.3.3
Posterior Deep Compartment
6.3.1.3.3.3.1
Flexor Digitorum Longus
6.3.1.3.3.3.1.1
6.3.1.3.3.3.2
Flexor Hallucis Longus
6.3.1.3.3.3.2.1
6.3.1.3.3.3.3
Tibialis Posterior
6.3.1.3.3.3.3.1
6.3.1.4
Intrinsic Foot Muscles
6.3.1.4.1
6.3.1.4.2
Dorsal Muscles
6.3.1.4.2.1
Extensor Digitorum Brevis
6.3.1.4.2.1.1
6.3.1.4.2.2
Extensor Hallucis Brevis
6.3.1.4.2.2.1
6.3.1.4.3
Plantar Muscles
6.3.1.4.3.1
Plantar First Superficial Layer
6.3.1.4.3.1.1
Abductor Digiti Minimi (Foot)
6.3.1.4.3.1.1.1
6.3.1.4.3.1.2
Abductor Hallucis
6.3.1.4.3.1.2.1
6.3.1.4.3.1.3
Flexor Digitorum Brevis
6.3.1.4.3.1.3.1
6.3.1.4.3.2
Plantar Second Layer
6.3.1.4.3.2.1
Lumbricals
6.3.1.4.3.2.1.1
6.3.1.4.3.2.2
Quadratus Plantae
6.3.1.4.3.2.2.1
6.3.1.4.3.3
Plantar Third Layer
6.3.1.4.3.3.1
Adductor Hallucis
6.3.1.4.3.3.1.1
6.3.1.4.3.3.2
Flexor Digiti Minimi Brevis
6.3.1.4.3.3.2.1
6.3.1.4.3.3.3
Flexor Hallucis Brevis
6.3.1.4.3.3.3.1
6.3.1.4.3.4
Plantar Fourth Deep Layer
6.3.1.4.3.4.1
Dorsal Interossei
6.3.1.4.3.4.1.1
6.3.1.4.3.4.2
Plantar Interossei
6.3.1.4.3.4.2.1
6.3.1.5
Neurology
6.3.1.5.1
Dermatomes
6.3.1.5.1.1
6.3.1.5.2
Major Nerve Supply
6.3.1.5.2.1
6.3.1.5.2.2
Cutaneous Nerves
6.3.1.5.2.2.1
Saphenous
6.3.1.5.2.2.1.1
6.3.1.5.2.2.2
Medial plantar (tibial)
6.3.1.5.2.2.2.1
6.3.1.5.2.2.3
Lateral plantar
6.3.1.5.2.2.3.1
6.3.1.5.2.2.4
Medial Sural Cutaneous Nerve
6.3.1.5.2.2.4.1
6.3.1.5.2.2.5
Medial Calcaneal (Tibial)
6.3.1.5.2.2.5.1
6.3.1.5.2.3
Motor Nerves
6.3.1.5.2.3.1
6.3.1.5.2.3.2
Articular Branches
6.3.1.5.2.3.2.1
Medial Plantar Nerve
6.3.1.5.2.3.2.1.1
6.3.1.5.2.3.2.2
Lateral Plantar Nerve
6.3.1.5.2.3.2.2.1
6.3.1.6
Osteology-Tarsals, Metatarsals, and
Phalanges
6.3.1.6.1
Tarsus (Tarsals) (7)
6.3.1.6.1.1
6.3.1.6.1.2
Posterior Tarsus
6.3.1.6.1.2.1
6.3.1.6.1.2.2
Talus
6.3.1.6.1.2.2.1
6.3.1.6.1.2.2.2
Body
6.3.1.6.1.2.2.2.1
6.3.1.6.1.2.2.3
Neck
6.3.1.6.1.2.2.3.1
6.3.1.6.1.2.3
Calcaneus (kal-KĀ-nē-us)
6.3.1.6.1.2.3.1
6.3.1.6.1.3
Anterior Tarsus
6.3.1.6.1.3.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.2
Cuboid Bone
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.2
Dorsal Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.2.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.3
Plantar Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.3.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.4
Lateral Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.4.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.5
Posterior Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.5.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.6
Anterior Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.6.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.7
Medial Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.2.7.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.3
Navicular Bone
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.2
Anterior Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.2.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.3
Posterior Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.3.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.4
Dorsal Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.4.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.5
Plantar Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.5.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.6
Medial Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.6.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.7
Lateral Surface
6.3.1.6.1.3.3.7.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.4
First Cuneiform Bone
6.3.1.6.1.3.4.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.5
Second Cuneiform Bone
6.3.1.6.1.3.5.1
6.3.1.6.1.3.6
Third Cuneiform Bone
6.3.1.6.1.3.6.1
6.3.1.6.2
Metatarsus (5)
6.3.1.6.2.1
6.3.1.6.3
Phalanges (14)
6.3.1.6.3.1
6.3.1.6.4
Total Bones of Foot=26
6.3.1.6.5
Arches of the Foot
6.3.1.6.5.1
6.3.1.6.5.2
Longitudinal Arch
6.3.1.6.5.2.1
6.3.1.6.5.2.2
Medial Longitudinal Arch
6.3.1.6.5.2.2.1
6.3.1.6.5.2.3
Lateral Longitudinal Arch
6.3.1.6.5.2.3.1
6.3.1.6.5.3
Transverse Arch
6.3.1.6.5.3.1
6.3.1.7
Arthrology (ar-THROL-ō-jē;
arthro=joint; logos=sturdy of)
6.3.1.7.1
Introduction
6.3.1.7.1.1
6.3.1.7.2
Classification of Joints
6.3.1.7.2.1
Functional
6.3.1.7.2.1.1
6.3.1.7.2.1.2
Synarthroses (sin-ar-THRŌ-sēz))
6.3.1.7.2.1.2.1
6.3.1.7.2.1.3
Amphiarthroses (am-fē –ar-THRŌ-sēz)
6.3.1.7.2.1.3.1
6.3.1.7.2.1.4
Diarthroses
6.3.1.7.2.1.4.1
6.3.1.7.2.2
Structural
6.3.1.7.2.2.1
6.3.1.7.2.2.2
Fibrous Joints
6.3.1.7.2.2.2.1
Syndesmosis (Sin’-dez-MŌ-sis)
6.3.1.7.2.2.2.1.1
6.3.1.7.2.2.3
Synovial Joints
6.3.1.7.2.2.3.1
Structure
6.3.1.7.2.2.3.1.1
6.3.1.7.2.2.3.1.2
Accessory Ligaments
6.3.1.7.2.2.3.1.3
6.3.1.7.2.2.3.1.4
Bursae
6.3.1.7.2.2.3.1.5
6.3.1.7.3
Types of Synovial Joints
6.3.1.7.3.1
6.3.1.7.3.2
Gliding (arthrodia (ar-THRŌ-dē-a)
6.3.1.7.3.2.1
6.3.1.7.3.3
Hinge (JIN-gli-mus)
6.3.1.7.3.3.1
6.3.1.7.3.4
Ellipsoidal (KON-di-loyd)
6.3.1.7.3.4.1
6.3.1.7.3.5
Saddle (Reciprocal Reception)
6.3.1.7.3.5.1
6.3.1.7.3.6
Ball and Socket spheroid (SFĒ-royd)
6.3.1.7.3.6.1
6.3.1.7.4
Joints of the Foot
6.3.1.7.4.1
Tibiofibular Joint
6.3.1.7.4.1.1
6.3.1.7.4.2
Talocrural (Ankle) Joint (ta’’lo-krōōr’al)
6.3.1.7.4.2.1
6.3.1.7.4.3
Subtalar/Talocalcaneal (ta’’lo-kal-ka-ne-al)
6.3.1.7.4.3.1
6.3.1.7.4.4
Talocalcaneonavicular (TCN)
6.3.1.7.4.4.1
6.3.1.7.4.5
Calcaneocuboid
6.3.1.7.4.5.1
6.3.1.7.4.6
Metatarsophalangeal Joints (MP)
6.3.1.7.4.6.1
6.3.1.7.4.7
Interphalangeal Joints of Toes (IP)
6.3.1.7.4.7.1
6.3.1.7.4.8
Intercuneiform and Cuneocuboid
6.3.1.7.4.8.1
6.3.1.7.4.9
Tarsometatarsal
6.3.1.7.4.9.1
6.3.1.7.4.10
Intermetatarsal
6.3.1.7.4.10.1
6.3.1.7.5
Synovial Membranes of Foot (Review)
6.3.1.7.5.1
6.3.1.7.5.2
Subtalar/Talocalcaneal
6.3.1.7.5.3
Talocalcaneal
6.3.1.7.5.4
Talocalcaneonavicular
6.3.1.7.5.5
Calcaneocuboid
6.3.1.7.5.6
Cuneonavicular
6.3.1.7.5.7
Intercuneiform, Cuneocuboid, and cuneiform (2nd &
3rd)/metatarsal (2nd, 3rd, & 4th)
6.3.1.7.5.8
1st cuneiform with great toe
6.3.1.7.5.9
Cuboid & Metatarsal (4th & 5th)
6.3.1.7.5.10
Navicular & Cuboid (Rare)
6.3.1.7.6
Achilles Tendon Bursa
6.3.1.7.6.1
Introduction
6.3.1.7.6.1.1
6.3.1.7.6.2
Retrocalcaneal Bursa
6.3.1.7.6.2.1
6.3.1.7.6.3
Calcaneal Bursa
6.3.1.8
Vascular
6.3.1.8.1
Arteries of the Foot
6.3.1.8.1.1
Dorsalis Pedis Artery (Dŏr-sălis Pēdĭs)
6.3.1.8.1.1.1
6.3.1.8.1.2
Medial And Lateral Plantar Arteries
6.3.1.8.1.2.1
6.3.1.8.2
Veins of the Foot
6.3.1.8.2.1
Dorsal Venous Arch (Medial)
6.3.1.8.2.1.1
6.3.1.8.2.2
Dorsal Venous Arch (Lateral)
6.3.1.8.2.2.1
6.3.1.9
Examination-Surface Anatomy
6.3.1.9.1
Bony Palpation
6.3.1.9.1.1
Head of the First Metatarsal Bone and the Metatarsophalangeal
Joint
6.3.1.9.1.1.1
6.3.1.9.1.2
First Metatarsocuneiform
6.3.1.9.1.2.1
6.3.1.9.1.3
Navicular Tubercle
6.3.1.9.1.3.1
6.3.1.9.1.4
Head of the Talus
6.3.1.9.1.4.1
6.3.1.9.1.5
Medial Malleolus
6.3.1.9.1.5.1
6.3.1.9.1.6
Sustentaculum Tali
6.3.1.9.1.6.1
6.3.1.9.1.7
Medial Tubercle of the Talus
6.3.1.9.1.7.1
6.3.1.9.1.8
Fifth Metatarsal Bone; Fifth Metatarsophalangeal Joint
6.3.1.9.1.8.1
6.3.1.9.1.9
Calcaneus
6.3.1.9.1.9.1
6.3.1.9.1.10
Peroneal Tubercle
6.3.1.9.1.10.1
6.3.1.9.1.11
Dome of the Talus
6.3.1.9.1.11.1
6.3.1.9.1.12
Inferior Tibiofibular Joint
6.3.1.9.1.12.1
6.3.1.9.1.13
Dome of the Calcaneus
6.3.1.9.1.13.1
6.3.1.9.1.14
Medial Tubercle of Calcaneus
6.3.1.9.1.14.1
6.3.1.9.1.15
Metatarsal Heads
6.3.1.9.1.15.1
6.3.1.9.2
Soft Tissue Palpation
6.3.1.9.2.1
Head of the First Metatarsal Bone
6.3.1.9.2.1.1
6.3.1.9.2.2
Navicular Tubercle and the Talar Head
6.3.1.9.2.2.1
6.3.1.9.2.3
Medial Malleolus Structures
6.3.1.9.2.3.1
6.3.1.9.2.3.2
Tibialis Posterior Tendon
6.3.1.9.2.3.2.1
6.3.1.9.2.3.3
Flexor Digitorum Longus Tendon
6.3.1.9.2.3.3.1
6.3.1.9.2.3.4
Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon
6.3.1.9.2.3.4.1
6.3.1.9.2.3.5
Posterior Tibial Artery
6.3.1.9.2.3.5.1
6.3.1.9.2.3.6
Tibial Nerve
6.3.1.9.2.3.6.1
6.3.1.9.2.3.7
Long Saphenous Vein
6.3.1.9.2.3.7.1
6.3.1.9.2.4
Peroneus Longus and Brevis Tendons
6.3.1.9.2.4.1
6.3.1.9.2.5
Head of Fifth Metatarsal
6.3.1.9.2.5.1
6.3.1.9.2.6
Achilles Tendon
6.3.1.9.2.6.1
6.3.1.9.2.7
Retrocalcaneal Bursa
6.3.1.9.2.7.1
6.3.1.9.2.8
Calcaneal Bursa
6.3.1.9.2.8.1
6.3.1.9.2.9
Plantar Aponeurosis
6.3.1.9.2.9.1
6.3.1.9.3
Muscle Testing
6.3.1.9.3.1
6.3.1.10
Biomechanics
6.3.1.10.1
Introduction
6.3.1.10.1.1
Planes
6.3.1.10.1.1.1
6.3.1.10.1.1.2
Sagittal Plane
6.3.1.10.1.1.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.1.3
Coronal (Frontal) Plane
6.3.1.10.1.1.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.1.4
Transverse (Horizontal) Plane
6.3.1.10.1.1.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.2
Axes
6.3.1.10.1.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.2.2
Sagittal Axis
6.3.1.10.1.2.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.2.3
Coronal (Frontal) Axis
6.3.1.10.1.2.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.2.4
Longitudinal Axis
6.3.1.10.1.2.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.2.5
Exceptions
6.3.1.10.1.2.5.1
6.3.1.10.1.3
Center of Gravity
6.3.1.10.1.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.4
Line of Gravity
6.3.1.10.1.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.5
Lever Systems and Leverage
6.3.1.10.1.5.1
6.3.1.10.1.5.2
First-class Levers
6.3.1.10.1.5.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.5.3
Second-class levers
6.3.1.10.1.5.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.5.4
Third-class Levers
6.3.1.10.1.5.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.5.5
Leverage
6.3.1.10.1.5.5.1
6.3.1.10.1.6
Gait Analysis
6.3.1.10.1.6.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.2
Stance Phase
6.3.1.10.1.6.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.3
Swing Phase
6.3.1.10.1.6.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.4
Width of the base (2”-4”)
6.3.1.10.1.6.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.5
Body’s center of gravity (2” S2) (Oscillates vertically 2”)
6.3.1.10.1.6.5.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.6
Knee remains flexed during all components of stance phase
(except heel strike)
6.3.1.10.1.6.6.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.7
Pelvis and trunk shift laterally (1” Laterally)
6.3.1.10.1.6.7.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.8
Average length of a step is approximately 15 inches
6.3.1.10.1.6.8.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.9
Average adult walks at a cadence of approximately 90 to 120
steps per minute
6.3.1.10.1.6.9.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.10
During swing phase, the pelvis rotates 40° forward
6.3.1.10.1.6.10.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.11
Stance phase
6.3.1.10.1.6.11.1
Heel Strike-Foot
6.3.1.10.1.6.11.1.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.11.2
Midstance=Foot
6.3.1.10.1.6.11.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.6.11.3
Push-Off=Foot
6.3.1.10.1.6.11.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.7
Movements of Specific Joints
6.3.1.10.1.7.1
Ankle Joint
6.3.1.10.1.7.1.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.1.2
Flexion (Plantar Flexion) and Extension (Dorsiflexion)
6.3.1.10.1.7.1.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.2
Subtalar Joint and Transverse Tarsal Joints
6.3.1.10.1.7.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.2.2
Supination and Pronation
6.3.1.10.1.7.2.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.3
Transverse Tarsal Joints
6.3.1.10.1.7.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.3.2
Adduction and Abduction
6.3.1.10.1.7.3.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.3.3
Inversion
6.3.1.10.1.7.3.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.3.4
Eversion
6.3.1.10.1.7.3.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.4
Metatarsophalangeal Joints
6.3.1.10.1.7.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.4.2
Flexion and extension
6.3.1.10.1.7.4.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.4.3
Adduction and Abduction
6.3.1.10.1.7.4.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.5
Interphalangeal Joints of toes
6.3.1.10.1.7.5.1
6.3.1.10.1.7.5.2
Flexion and extension
6.3.1.10.1.7.5.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.8
Structural Alignment
6.3.1.10.1.8.1
6.3.1.10.1.9
Arthrokinematics of the Ankle-
6.3.1.10.1.9.1
Foot Complex
6.3.1.10.1.9.1.1
Ankle Mortise Joint
6.3.1.10.1.9.1.1.1
6.3.1.10.1.9.1.2
Subtalar Joint
6.3.1.10.1.9.1.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.9.1.3
Neutral Position of a Joint
6.3.1.10.1.9.1.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.9.1.4
Transverse Tarsal Joints: Talonavicular and Calcaneocuboid
Joints
6.3.1.10.1.9.1.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.10
Osteokinematics of the Ankle-Foot Complex
6.3.1.10.1.10.1
Terminology
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.1
Inversion-Eversion
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.1.1
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.2
Abduction-Adduction
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.3
Internal-External Rotation
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.3.1
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.4
Plantar flexion-Dorsiflexion
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.4.1
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.5
Pronation-Supination
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.5.1
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.6
Pronated Foot-Supinated Foot
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.6.1
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.7
Valgus-Varus
6.3.1.10.1.10.1.7.1
6.3.1.10.1.10.2
Orientation of Joint Axes and the Effect on Movement
6.3.1.10.1.10.2.1
6.3.1.10.1.10.3
Ankle and Foot During Gait
6.3.1.10.1.10.3.1
6.3.1.11
Pathology
6.3.1.11.1
Achilles Tendonitis
6.3.1.11.1.1
6.3.1.11.2
Arthritis
6.3.1.11.2.1
6.3.1.11.3
Bursitis
6.3.1.11.3.1
6.3.1.11.4
Calcaneal Spur Syndrome (Traction osteophytes (heel spurs))
6.3.1.11.4.1
6.3.1.11.5
Connective Tissue Cell Stress/Death Pre strain/Sprain
6.3.1.11.5.1
6.3.1.11.6
Dislocation
6.3.1.11.6.1
6.3.1.11.7
Flexor Hallucis Longus (FHL) Tendonitis/Tenosynovitis
6.3.1.11.7.1
6.3.1.11.8
Gouty Arthritis (GOW-tē)
6.3.1.11.8.1
6.3.1.11.9
Metatarsalgia
6.3.1.11.9.1
6.3.1.11.10
Morton's Neuroma: Interdigital Perineural Fibrosis
6.3.1.11.10.1
6.3.1.11.11
Osteoarthritis (os’-tē-ō-ar-THRĪ-tis)
6.3.1.11.11.1
6.3.1.11.12
Peroneal Tendonitis/ Tenosynovitis
6.3.1.11.12.1
6.3.1.11.13
Peroneal Tendon Dislocation/Subluxation
6.3.1.11.13.1
6.3.1.11.14
Pes Cavus (High Arch-Cavus Foot)
6.3.1.11.14.1
6.3.1.11.15
Pes Planus (Flat Foot)
6.3.1.11.15.1
6.3.1.11.16
Plantar Fasciitis
6.3.1.11.16.1
6.3.1.11.17
Posterior Tibial Tendon Rupture
6.3.1.11.17.1
6.3.1.11.18
Posterior Tibial Tendonitis (Posterior Tibial Tendon
Dysfunction (PTTD))
6.3.1.11.18.1
6.3.1.11.19
Rheumatism (rheumat=Subject to flux)
6.3.1.11.19.1
6.3.1.11.20
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (ROO-ma-toyd)
6.3.1.11.20.1
6.3.1.11.21
Sever's Disease
6.3.1.11.21.1
6.3.1.11.22
Shin Splints / Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome
6.3.1.11.22.1
6.3.1.11.23
Sprain and Strain
6.3.1.11.23.1
6.3.1.11.24
Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome
6.3.1.11.24.1
6.3.1.11.25
Tendinitis or Tenosynovitis
6.3.1.11.25.1
6.3.1.11.26
Trigger Points Plantar Foot Muscles
6.3.1.11.26.1
6.3.2
Treatment Modalities
6.3.2.1
Introduction
6.3.2.1.1
6.3.2.2
Massage
6.3.2.2.1
6.3.2.3
Stretching
6.3.2.3.1
6.3.2.4
Resistance Exercise
6.3.2.4.1
6.3.2.5
Range of Motion
6.3.2.5.1
6.3.2.6
Home Exercises
6.3.2.6.1
[1] Cyriax J.,
Coldham M. (1984). Treatment by massage, manipulation and injection. Textbook
Of Orthopaedic Medicine, 11th Edition, pp. 8 - 12.
[2] Rogoff Jb
(ed). (1980). Manipulation, traction and massage. Baltimore: Williams
& Wilkins.
[3] Tappin Fm.
(1978). Healing massage techniques: a study of eastern and western methods.
Reston, Va: Reston Publishing.
[4] Wood Ec.
(1981). Beard's massage: principles and techniques. : Wb Saunders.
[5] Chamberlain
Gj. (1982). Cyriax's friction massage: a review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther,
4, pp. 16 - 32.
[6] Cyriax J.
(1977). Deep Friction. Physiotherapy, 63, pp. 60 - 61.
[7] Palastanga
N. (1986). Connective Tissue Massage. In Greive GP (ed): Modern Manual
Therapy of the Vertebral Column.
Churchill Livingstone.
[8] Walker Jm.
(1984). Deep transverse frictions in ligament healing. J Orthop Sports Phys
Ther, 6, pp. 89 - 94.
[9] Gutstein M:
Diagnosis and treatment of muscular rheumatism. Br J Phys Med 1:302-321.
1938.
[10] Good MG:
Die primäre Rolle der Muskulatur in der Pathogenese der rheumatischen Krankheit
und die therapeutische Lösung des Rheuma problems. Medizinische (Stuttgart) 13:450-454 1957
[11] Don R.
Revis, Jr., M.d."Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy."E-medicine(2002).21 Jun.
2002.<http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic2936.htm>.
[12] Kellgren
JH: Observations on referred pain arising from muscle. Clin Sci 3:175-190,
1938.
[13] Don R.
Revis, Jr., M.d."Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy."E-medicine(2002).21
Jun. 2002.<http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic2936.htm>.
[14] Travell J:
Introductory Comments. In Connective Tissues. Transactions of the Fifth
Conference, 1954, edited by C. Ragan. Josiah Macy. Ir. Foundation. New York.
1954 (pp. 12-22).
[15] Kellgren
JH: Observations on referred pain arising from muscle. Clin Sci 3:175-190,
1938.
[16] Inman VT,
Saunders JB, deCM: Referred pain from skeletal structures. J Nerv Ment Dis
99:660- 667, 1944.
[17] Kellgren
JH: Observations on referred pain arising from muscle. Clin Sci
3:175-190, 1938.
[18] Kellgren
JH: A preliminary account of referred pains arising from muscle. Br Med J
1:325-327. 1938.
[19] Travell,
Rinzler S, Herman M: Pain and disability of the shoulder and arm: treatment by intramuscular
infiltration with procaine hydrochloride. ] AMA 120:417-422, 1942.
[20] Good M: Five
hundred cases of myalgia in the British army. Ann Rheum Dis 3:118-138,
1942.
[21] Kelly M:
The treatment of fibrositis and allied disorders by local anesthesia. Med J
Aust 1:294- 298, 1941.
[22] Hockaday
IM, Whitty CWM: Patterns of referred pain in the normal subject. Brain 90:481
496, 1967.
[23] Sola AB;
Kuitert JH: Myofascial trigger point pain in the neck and shoulder girdle. Northwest
Med 54:980-984, 1955.
[24] Bonica JJ:
Myofascial syndromes with trigger mechanism. In The Management of Pain.
Edited by J.J. Bonica, Lea & Febiger. Philadelphia, 1953 (pp. 1150-1151).
[25] Kendall HO,
Kendall FP, Wadsworth GE: Muscles, Testing and Function, Ed. 2.
Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore. 1971.
[26] Inman VT,
Saunders JB, deCM: Referred pain from skeletal structures. J Nerv Ment
Dis 99:660- 667, 1944.
[27] Sola AB;
Kuitert JH: Myofascial trigger point pain in the neck and shoulder girdle. Northwest
Med 54:980-984, 1955.
[28] Travell J.
Bigelow NH: Referred somatic pain does not follow a simple "segmental'.
pattern. Fed Proc 5:106.1946.
[29] Travell
Janet G., Simons David G.(1983).Myofascial pain and dysfunction-the trigger
point manual .428 E. Preston Street Baltimore, Md 21202, U.S.A:Williams
& Wilkins.
[30] Travell J:
Introductory Comments. In Connective Tissues. Transactions of the Fifth
Conference, 1954, edited by C. Ragan. Josiah Macy. Ir. Foundation. New
York. 1954 (pp. 12-22).
[31]
Popelianskii la Iu, Zaslavskii ES, Veselovskii VP; [Medicosocial significance,
etiology, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of nonarticular disease of soft tissues
of the limbs and back.] (Russian) Vopr Revm 3:38-43, 1976.
[32] Herrr FW:
Neuroanatomical substrates of nociception in the spinal cord. Pain 1:325-356,
1975.
[33] Travell
Janet G., Simons David G. Myofascial Pain And Dysfunction-the Trigger Point
Manual. 428 E. Preston Street Baltimore, Md 21202, U.S.A: Williams &
Wilkins, 1983.
[34] Kellgren
JH: Observations on referred pain arising from muscle. Clin Sci
3:175-190, 1938.
[35] Travell J:
Pain mechanisms in connective tissue. In Connective Tissues.
Transactions of the Second Conference, 1951, edited by C. Ragan.
losiah Macy. Jr. Foundation. New York. 1952 (pp. 96- 102.105-109, 111).
[36] Travell I:
Basis for the multiple uses of lacal block of somatic trigger areas (procaine
infiltration and ethyl chloride spray). Miss Valley Med 1 71:13-22.1949.
[37] Travell J.
Bobb AL: Mechanism of relief of pain in sprains by local injection techniques.
Fed Proc 6:378, 1947
[38] Leriche R:
Des effetes de I'anesthesie a la novocaine des ligaments et des insertions
tendineuses peri-articulaires dans certaines maladies articulaires et dans
vices de position fonctionnels des articulations. Gazette Hopitaux 103:1294,
1930.
[39] Gorrell RL:
Troublesome ankle disorders and what to do about them. Consultant 16:64-69,
1976
[40] Kraus H: Clinical
Treatment of Back and Neck Pain. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970
(pp. 95, 107).
[41] Hackett GS:
Ligament and Tendon Relaxation Treated by Prolotherapy, Ed. 3. Charles
C Thomas, Sprillgfield. III., 1958 (pp. 27-36).
[42] Dittrich
RJ: Low back pain-referred pain from deep somatic structure of the back.
J-Lancet 73:63-68, 1963.
[43] Weiser HI:
Semimembranosus insertion syndrome: a treatable and frequent cause of persistent
knee pain. Arch Phys Med Rehobil 60:317-319, 1979.
[44] De Valera
E, Raftery H: Lower abdominal and pelvic pain in women. In Advances in Pain
Research and Therapy, edited by J.J. Bonica, D. Albe-Fessard, Vol. 1. Raven
Press, New York, 1976 (pp. 935-936).
[45] Kellgren
JH: Deep pain sensibility. Lancet 1:943- 949, 1949.
[46] Inman VT,
Saunders JB, deCM: Referred pain from skeletal structures. J Nerv Ment
Dis 99:660- 667, 1944.
[47] Gross D:
Therapeutische Lokalanästhesie. Hippokrates Verlag, Stuttgart. 1972 (p. 142).
[48] Lawrence
RM: Osteopuncture: theory and practice. Presented at the annual meeting of the
North American Academy of Manipulative Medicine. 1977.
[49] Gutstein M:
Diagnosis and treatment of muscular rheumatism. Br J Phys Med 1:302-321.
1938.
[50] Good MG: Die
primäre Rolle der Muskulatur in der Pathogenese der rheumatischen Krankheit und
die therapeutische Lösung des Rheuma problems.
Medizinische (Stuttgart) 13:450-454 1957.
[51] Travell
Janet G., Simons David G.(1983).Myofascial pain and dysfunction-the trigger
point manual .428 E. Preston Street Baltimore, Md 21202, U.S.A:Williams
& Wilkins.
[52] Travell
Janet G., Simons David G.(1983).Myofascial pain and dysfunction-the trigger
point manual .428 E. Preston Street Baltimore, Md 21202, U.S.A:Williams
& Wilkins.
[53] Don R.
Revis, Jr., M.d."Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy."E-medicine(2002).21
Jun. 2002.<http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic2936.htm>.
[54]
Mike."Trigger Points And Myofascial Pain
Syndrome".http://pub141.ezboard.com/fmikesmedcarefrm19.showmessage?topicid=32.topic.(24-May-03).
[55] Stephen
Barrett, M.d.Stephen Barrett, M.d.."Chiropractic's Elusive
Subluxation".http://www.chirobase.org/01general/chirosub.html.(24-May-03).
[56] National
Association For Chiropractic Medicine."National Association For
Chiropractic Medicine".http://www.chiromed.org/.(24-May-03).
[57] Sola AB,
Rodenberger ML, Gettys BB: Incidence of hypersensitive areas in posterior
shoulder muscles. Am J. Phys Med 34:585-590, 1955.
[58] Travell
Janet G., Simons David G.(1983).Myofascial pain and dysfunction-the trigger
point manual .428 E. Preston Street Baltimore, Md 21202, U.S.A:Williams
& Wilkins.
[59] Travell
Janet G., Simons David G.(1983).Myofascial pain and dysfunction-the trigger
point manual .428 E. Preston Street Baltimore, Md 21202, U.S.A:Williams &
Wilkins. Pages 36-37
[60] Travell
Janet G., Simons David G.(1983).Myofascial pain and dysfunction-the trigger
point manual .428 E. Preston Street Baltimore, Md 21202, U.S.A:Williams &
Wilkins. Page 13
[61] Travell
Janet G., Simons David G.(1983).Myofascial pain and dysfunction-the trigger
point manual .428 E. Preston Street Baltimore, Md 21202, U.S.A:Williams &
Wilkins. Page 13